So you ignore eveything he says just because he once failed in his first job as head coach in Spain? Yeah right...
Oh he can talk the talk alright but 'when it comes to walking the walk ..
He's a United man, a specialist in boring, predictable, cliched twaddle just like the majority of Sky pundits. Kane needing a rest is just another simplistic predictable narrative like the 'never scores in August' brick the nauseating media like to ram down our throats at every opportunity.
So how about instead, him and all the other stupid pundits asking the obvious questions? Eg why does his manager continue playing him through this spell?
Or how about them bringing a bit of intelligent analysis to bear on the situation? Such as what has happened in the past when prolific strikers like Kane have appeared to need a rest? Like how long should he be rested for? A week? A month? Longer?
And what has been the outcome for player and club when others have returned from a period of rest? Did they always come back as refreshed as they were supposed to, or did they still look off their game when they came back? Does a rest ALWAYS do the trick? Do they ALWAYS start scoring freely immediately upon return?
And how about the alternative of sticking with the player and how well or otherwise that has worked in the past? We hear no mention of the fact Kane has come through these jaded spells before by continuing to play and started scoring freely again, sometimes producing astonishing numbers in the process.
For my part I'm happy for the manager to decide what is best for his players. He seems to be doing a pretty good job one way or another so instead of joining in with the inane 'needs a rest' chorus I'll continue to put my trust in Poch, thank you very much.
[/QUOTE]
