• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Harry Kane MBE

Who knows but not signing keeps his options open and thats the point. At this stage that might be more appealing to him.

Not ruling out as a posibility. If he was willing to go abroad afterwards i'd think it would be his best option. Could have a season at madrid or juve or somewhere. Get some silverware. In england i think city would be his only real choice unless utd suddenly got their brick together. Not sure he'd want to play as second fiddle at city or if they'd go for a 31 year old. So there is a good possibility he could stay even if he ran his contract down. Which really reduces the reason of running down your contract, especially as you'd be losing money.
 
If Kane was available on a free aged 31, City, Liverpool, Chelsea and Man U would take him.

Ofcourse they would. That's not the point. He would want to be first choice most likely. Would he be that at city? Would he want to go to chelsea? If he wants success would utd be able to give that him? Would liverpool want to pay the signing on fee and wages, he's on £300k with bonuses at week with us. Missing out on a pay rise for 2 years, he'd want a hefty signing on fee to make it up.
 
Tbf it's byern making the comments. They've just lost the best striker they've ever had, so are saying things to appease the fans. As they can't replace him.

Why be fair? Are the media? They take any chance to put a negative spin on anything we do. Not seen many stories about Saka being looked at and the Rice thing has disappeared completely, hardly any comments on City or Chelsea losing players.
 
Why be fair? Are the media? They take any chance to put a negative spin on anything we do. Not seen many stories about Saka being looked at and the Rice thing has disappeared completely, hardly any comments on City or Chelsea losing players.

What a load of gonads there's stories in the mail and metro this morning of city being interested in saka. The reason kane is mentioned this week is because both byerns chairman and manager have both come out and said they want him. If boehly came out and said chelsea wanted rice, the papers would be all over it. The media write stories they think will make them money. They haven't got a vendetta against spurs.
 
Back