• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Harry Kane MBE

Raziel said:
And bitching about it, don't forget that part, same as Zaha, always fudging whining to the ref.
Click to expand...
Richarlison is just as bad. I hate players that just never seem happy and always look miserable. Not like Roy Keane, but like Zaha and Richarlison faces that look like they've just been slapped.
 
Been saying this since the euros, Southgate had no control over the team, there are selfish ones playing for themselves.
Raziel said:
Amazing watching fudging Mount, Sterling and Grealish repeatedly not pass to Kane when Kane is in/around the box, preferring to tippy tappy brick until closed down or run into a dead end.

Kane's goal comes from a sequence where he's in the box and the pass just doesn't come, so he goes out, collects and shoots.

How fudging hard is it to tell a team with one of the best strikers in the world, when you have 68% possession, just get the ball to Kane?
Click to expand...

Sent from my SM-T865 using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
 
Thought he was poor today looks disinterested. Also might be just me but Kane looks a bit heavy. He’s always been a touch sluggish but looks off the pace.

He needs to get himself in and amongst the CBs again. Look I know it’s frustrating for a striker not getting the ball but you got to stay up there be a presence and give the defenders something to think about.

Him dropping gives CBs an easy ride which you don’t want. Yes his passing is good but with no Son we needed him as a forward presence he did not provide that. CBs must be loving playing us now . He used to scare them . Hold them off , make runs into the box. Yes the style of football has changed but still needs to be a threat in final third.He is constantly to deep.

Also times where he was out on left and Dele up top today that was strange.
 
djp82 said:
Thought he was poor today looks disinterested. Also might be just me but Kane looks a bit heavy. He’s always been a touch sluggish but looks off the pace.

He needs to get himself in and amongst the CBs again. Look I know it’s frustrating for a striker not getting the ball but you got to stay up there be a presence and give the defenders something to think about.

Him dropping gives CBs an easy ride which you don’t want. Yes his passing is good but with no Son we needed him as a forward presence he did not provide that. CBs must be loving playing us now . He used to scare them . Hold them off , make runs into the box. Yes the style of football has changed but still needs to be a threat in final third.He is constantly to deep.

Also times where he was out on left and Dele up top today that was strange.
Click to expand...
Not defending him, he was poor with a few touches he got today, but might as well have sat on the bench with the amount of decent ball that was played forward.
Heard a stat that it's the first time in his career that he has not had a touch in the box and not had a shot on goal. That's a really damning statistic on the way we
played and were set up to play.
 
DubSpur said:
Not defending him, he was poor with a few touches he got today, but might as well have sat on the bench with the amount of decent ball that was played forward.
Heard a stat that it's the first time in his career that he has not had a touch in the box and not had a shot on goal. That's a really damning statistic on the way we
played and were set up to play.
Click to expand...

It is very damming. Even when he dropped he offered nothing.
 
djp82 said:
Thought he was poor today looks disinterested. Also might be just me but Kane looks a bit heavy. He’s always been a touch sluggish but looks off the pace.

He needs to get himself in and amongst the CBs again. Look I know it’s frustrating for a striker not getting the ball but you got to stay up there be a presence and give the defenders something to think about.

Him dropping gives CBs an easy ride which you don’t want. Yes his passing is good but with no Son we needed him as a forward presence he did not provide that. CBs must be loving playing us now . He used to scare them . Hold them off , make runs into the box. Yes the style of football has changed but still needs to be a threat in final third.He is constantly to deep.

Also times where he was out on left and Dele up top today that was strange.
Click to expand...
He looks older than he is when he plays recently, even for England. Reminds me of Gudjohnsen when who was still class on the ball fwhen he came but couldn’t move! My memory is playing tricks on me though I thought he was about 35 then but he was actually 31!
 
I have always preferred pacy, dazzling players, which he no longer is, and I have gone from having no particular opinions on the chap’s personality to a broadly negative view, and I would have been quite happy if we’d got anything north of £120m for him from a club outside of the EPL, ideally from somewhere like Motherwell after a surprise purchase by an eccentric shortbread tycoon so that no-one could accuse us of taking blood money, but I do trust him to recover some form from that abomination of a performance yesterday.
 
He was poor for sure, i hope i am wrong but i said a year or so back that i could see him struggling once he gets into his 30s because of all the ankle injurys he has suffered. Lets hope i am.
 
BLOODY HELL!! What a miserable bunch some of you so-called fans are. Kane remains one of the outstanding strikers, not just in the PL but in world football, but to read some of these posts you'd think he was a complete waste of space.

Sure he did not have the best of games on Saturday but he got practically zero service. Remember also it was a 12.30 ko after returning from Poland (having brilliantly humiliated that szczit Szczesny), so precisely what did you all expect?

Some of you really do need to take a look at yourselves.
 
djp82 said:
Thought he was poor today looks disinterested. Also might be just me but Kane looks a bit heavy. He’s always been a touch sluggish but looks off the pace.

He needs to get himself in and amongst the CBs again. Look I know it’s frustrating for a striker not getting the ball but you got to stay up there be a presence and give the defenders something to think about.

Him dropping gives CBs an easy ride which you don’t want. Yes his passing is good but with no Son we needed him as a forward presence he did not provide that. CBs must be loving playing us now . He used to scare them . Hold them off , make runs into the box. Yes the style of football has changed but still needs to be a threat in final third.He is constantly to deep.

Also times where he was out on left and Dele up top today that was strange.
Click to expand...

Kane has had many performances like yesterday in the last couple years. I have some sympathy for him given it must be hard being a CF in a team who's primary aim is to not concede
 
ShipOfGoldblum said:
I have always preferred pacy, dazzling players, which he no longer is, and I have gone from having no particular opinions on the chap’s personality to a broadly negative view, and I would have been quite happy if we’d got anything north of £120m for him from a club outside of the EPL, ideally from somewhere like Motherwell after a surprise purchase by an eccentric shortbread tycoon so that no-one could accuse us of taking blood money, but I do trust him to recover some form from that abomination of a performance yesterday.
Click to expand...

Shortbread is primarily made from sugar which as i"m sure you are aware is tainted by the slave trade. So still blood money.

If it is going to be shortbread money it will either be Greenock Morton as that was the home of tate and lyles refineries, or st Johnstone in perth as that is as about as twee as you can get and life still looks a 1950s shortbread tim lid.
None of them are exactly desirable places to live, but out of the three perth has some nice areas around it.
It does of course go without saying that they are all better than Dundee, which is a hell hole.
 
glasgowspur said:
Shortbread is primarily made from sugar which as i"m sure you are aware is tainted by the slave trade. So still blood money.

If it is going to be shortbread money it will either be Greenock Morton as that was the home of tate and lyles refineries, or st Johnstone in perth as that is as about as twee as you can get and life still looks a 1950s shortbread tim lid.
None of them are exactly desirable places to live, but out of the three perth has some nice areas around it.
It does of course go without saying that they are all better than Dundee, which is a hell hole.
Click to expand...

Admirable, thank you. I think that’s Kane’s future settled.
 
glasgowspur said:
Shortbread is primarily made from sugar which as i"m sure you are aware is tainted by the slave trade. So still blood money.

If it is going to be shortbread money it will either be Greenock Morton as that was the home of tate and lyles refineries, or st Johnstone in perth as that is as about as twee as you can get and life still looks a 1950s shortbread tim lid.
None of them are exactly desirable places to live, but out of the three perth has some nice areas around it.
It does of course go without saying that they are all better than Dundee, which is a hell hole.
Click to expand...

‘glasgowspurs guide to Scotland’

That’s a book I’d like to buy!
 
Nigeyman said:
‘glasgowspurs guide to Scotland’

That’s a book I’d like to buy!
Click to expand...

Some fantastic places in Scotland,
st andrews is great, and not all about golf.
Dumfries and Galloway is beautiful and very varied.
The east coast is a marvel with great scenery if you avoid it either side of Edinburgh. The west coast is good but tge weather is worse and the roads poor.
Edinburgh is the best city, not that that's difficult, but the people are weird.
Glasgow, Dundee and Aberdeen are dumps.
Three top tips for visiting Scotland, keep away from the major towns and cities. Stay in a really good B&B, not a hotel, hotels are awful outside the big cities.
Don’t stay anywhere more than three days, tour.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back