Mulletperm
Mauricio Taricco
Just checked, it's actually from April.
Keeping a world class striker for another year will hardly damage us. So let's end the nonsense and at least not make him feel hated and unwelcome! We'll need him at his best to move forward!
COYS!
Whilst I agree
It’s also hard not say the flip side is he goes and we get that big pay day which can mean more investment in the team so we’re not totally reliant on Kane
We (IMO) play much more as a team when we’re without him
The guys up there with the very best but that does lead to players looking to him to do things rather than them doing it themselves
City just dont want to pay the price and by acting a bell ends it’s causing us frustration
@TeleFootball
] | Daniel Levy believes the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ was Harry Kane would only be sold abroad unless an "amazing" offer was made in the Premier League. Kane’s camp believe an “amazing” offer of £125M has been made but Levy is refusing to negotiate.
City really have fudged up here - £125 million would be an amazing offer before they spent 100 million on JG.
Hasn’t necessarily got anything to do with the Grealish deal at all. If all was said was ‘an amazing offer’ then that’s just down to interpretation. Levy could think that 200m is an amazing offer whereas Kane and his camp see something just north of 100m being amazing. Without agreeing an actual figure this ‘gentleman’s agreement’ is just flim flam, and we all know Levy knew this…..@TeleFootball
] | Daniel Levy believes the ‘gentleman’s agreement’ was Harry Kane would only be sold abroad unless an "amazing" offer was made in the Premier League. Kane’s camp believe an “amazing” offer of £125M has been made but Levy is refusing to negotiate.
City really have fudged up here - £125 million would be an amazing offer before they spent 100 million on JG.
They want to sell Silva who plays the same roleI really don’t understand the city logic. JG is a good player but not a position they need to strengthen. A number 9 is what they needed yet spent most of their money on JG instead.
Hasn’t necessarily got anything to do with the Grealish deal at all. If all was said was ‘an amazing offer’ then that’s just down to interpretation. Levy could think that 200m is an amazing offer whereas Kane and his camp see something just north of 100m being amazing. Without agreeing an actual figure this ‘gentleman’s agreement’ is just flim flam, and we all know Levy knew this…..
No one is paying anywhere near £100m for Lewandowski. He may well be the best striker in the world but at 32 years old he only has 2 maybe 3 years left in him.Lewandowski on the market now for £100 m plus
Money that would allow Bayern to go to Haaland
No one is paying anywhere near £100m for Lewandowski. He may well be the best striker in the world but at 32 years old he only has 2 maybe 3 years left in him.
Lewandowski on the market now for £100 m plus
Money that would allow Bayern to go to Haaland
I know what market precedent is, but its still irrelevant to what Levy considers an 'amazing offer'. If City had signed Grealish for £50m, I still don't think Levy would have said £100m is enough.It does, it's called market precedent, before the deals no one really knew what the Covid impact on the market was
Grealish going for £100M, Lukaku for ~£120M sets a baseline
Said it before, market value of Grealish and Kane were about £55M apart (hence £150M-£160M is actually right on the money)
I think if you go back and listen to Simon Jorden's statement, it lines up, his view -> Levy would have said, yes we will sell you, but we will want maximum value out of the sale for Tottenham Hotspur.
At this point it's simple, either City pays, or he stays, either way his reputation is in tatters ..
Hmmm .. sell Kane for £150M, buy Lewandowski for say £80M-£85 (€100M), gives you three years to get some combination of our young strikers to make the transition?
I know what market precedent is, but its still irrelevant to what Levy considers an 'amazing offer'. If City had signed Grealish for £50m, I still don't think Levy would have said £100m is enough.
Does it strengthen the case for a higher valuation of Kane? Of course it does. But the point is 'amazing offer' is down to interpretation and doesnt have a specific figure therefore this whole 'gentlemans agreement' thing is pretty pointless....
The Kane's are getting a lesson in reality.Hasn’t necessarily got anything to do with the Grealish deal at all. If all was said was ‘an amazing offer’ then that’s just down to interpretation. Levy could think that 200m is an amazing offer whereas Kane and his camp see something just north of 100m being amazing. Without agreeing an actual figure this ‘gentleman’s agreement’ is just flim flam, and we all know Levy knew this…..
Hmmm .. sell Kane for £150M, buy Lewandowski for say £80M-£85 (€100M), gives you three years to get some combination of our young strikers to make the transition?
And a winning mentality.Hmmm .. sell Kane for £150M, buy Lewandowski for say £80M-£85 (€100M), gives you three years to get some combination of our young strikers to make the transition?
Inter have the Lukaku money and need to replace him.Not sure I see Lewandowski coming to Spurs - I saw the news and just assumed he was angling for a move to City. Unless he's willing to move to a team which wont win their league or CL in the next 2 years, I dont see what other teams could afford him, even for say £70m
Will be interesting to see what Bayern would do - go for Haaland, depsite him being cheaper next year, come after Kane or....