Finney Is Back
Andy Thompson
Not sure that logic works.... If Kulu played but Kane was missing we'd probably see the same thing.It’s him as he is the one we’re missing
Not sure that logic works.... If Kulu played but Kane was missing we'd probably see the same thing.It’s him as he is the one we’re missing
Not reallyWell, Kane has scored 10 of our 23 goals this season, and I think without those goals our points return would probably be less than 1.5
Both Richarlison and Moura cover Kulu. Or are you arguing that they are different types of player to Kulu?Not really
We could have another forward there in theory as we would still start with 11 players
The issue so we do have cover for Kane, we have NO cover for Kulu
Don’t agreeNot sure that logic works.... If Kulu played but Kane was missing we'd probably see the same thing.
Ah the old 'they were easy goals' argument.... By that logic every striker there has ever been should've scored as many goals as Gary LinekerDon’t agree
Kane has scored the easiest goals he could score for us this season. He has been in the right place for those flicked on corners (set plays) which is half his goals and the penalties too
That’s not to say Kane hasn’t been decent this season but we haven’t seen magic Kane yet and his goals he has scored this season could be scored by others
Magic kane scores goals others can’t
They are massively massively inferior to kulu and play such a different wayBoth Richarlison and Moura cover Kulu. Or are you arguing that they are different types of player to Kulu?
If the latter than the same applies for Kane.... There is nobody else in our squad who can do what he does.
Both Richarlison and Moura cover Kulu. Or are you arguing that they are different types of player to Kulu?
If the latter than the same applies for Kane.... There is nobody else in our squad who can do what he does.
As is every option we have to play instead of Kane.They are massively massively inferior to kulu and play such a different way
If we’re talking Kanes passing, I’d agree but we haven’t seen that much to it
His finishing has been standard by his normal standards if that makes sense… kind of goals moura or Richy could score
They are not easy goalsAh the old 'they were easy goals' argument.... By that logic every striker there has ever been should've scored as many goals as Gary Lineker
(and your argument also ignores the fact that pretty much every attack we launch comes from a ball into Kane and him feeding somebody else).
We have Richarlison and Moura who cover Kulu. The drop offs from Kulu to those players is no larger than the drop off from Kane to whoever comes in to replace him.They are not easy goals
But they are the kind of goals that I’ve seen Richarlisons score plenty of
Don’t think I’m under playing Kanes status and level but we have some cover for him. We have no cover for kulu
Richy is better in the air than Kane and half Kanes goals have been headers I believeBut Richarlison does not cover Kulu and that is the problem, if anything he covers Son or Kane, although I question whether he would have scored as many goals as Kane.
Oh it isWe have Richarlison and Moura who cover Kulu. The drop offs from Kulu to those players is no larger than the drop off from Kane to whoever comes in to replace him.
Being good in the air and being in the right place to score a header are two different things.Richy is better in the air than Kane and half Kanes goals have been headers I believe
Kane has also been taking, and scoring generally the penalties which again can be taken by others
It is, because we don’t have Kulu who does that role. It’s why with Kane and kulu we can be devastating.Being good in the air and being in the right place to score a header are two different things.
Richarlison (and Son) are also poor at dropping off, getting on the ball and hitting good, well timed and weighted passes (which is pretty much our entire attacking philosophy at the moment)
It's not just the quality, they are both right footed and not players who see the quick or final pass.We have Richarlison and Moura who cover Kulu. The drop offs from Kulu to those players is no larger than the drop off from Kane to whoever comes in to replace him.
Moura and richy have awful first touches tooIt's not just the quality, they are both right footed and not players who see the quick or final pass.
I think walking Bale had more in common with Kulu, there's a difference in how defenders treat a player who can cut in and score off their left, just holding them up isn't always enough, whereas Moura and Richie I'd say are easier to defend against on the deck as you'd be prepped for them trying to go outside.
Even Son, who has a pretty decent left foot doesn't offer the same threat from that side of the pitch.
Moura and richy have awful first touches too
His touch and awareness is really weakMoura does have a bad first touch, but his reaction speed is incredible so can get away with it sometimes.