That's where we finally differ on our interpretations. I don't believe that's ambition. AVB evidently doesn't believe that to be ambition. And if you accept the press stories of AVB using his youth strategy to ace the interview as being true, it does follow by logical extension that you also believe those great claims about 20 million pound warchests the papers put out around the time he was appointed. 20 million net spend, in other words. But no, we made a profit. What does that entail?
It doesn't make me feel better. It makes me feel significantly worse, because believe it or not, I don't want this club to be regarded as the ultimate wide boys of football, deceiving (or at the very least misleading) managers about what we're willing to spend (nothing above what we make from sales, absolutely nothing), what we're willing to risk in pursuit of our 'ambitions' (nothing, absolutely nothing), what our 'ambitions' actually are (hover around the top six/top eight while the stadium's built mainly by using the club's own money, and then watch our owners make a huge profit selling us on to some other poor sod)....I want our club to be the type of club that managers of AVB's calibre look to as an opportunity, rather than a deathtrap for their repuations and managerial ambitions.
I say again: this man, AVB, lost eleven million pounds choosing to come to us. It isn't feasible that he did so knowing that he'd end up having to settle for Clint Dempsey instead of Hulk, or that he'd end up angrily leaving after Levy coldly demanded that he play Adebayor after a 5-0 defeat by Liverpool.
Does AVB actually have any kind of calibre?