Was thinking about the possibility of Van Gaal coming. Most articles I can find online suggest he wouldn't want to work under a director of football. Will Baldini be out the door then?
LVG has always worked with a DoF. Including in recent years at AZ and Bayern.
I don't think he'd work without one (like AVB didn't want to). LVG wants to concentrate on coaching and finds transfers business disruptive.
Baldini was brought in as a deal-breaker as far as I can see.
As far as I can see, we operate a transfer committee to decide targets.
Baldini will have an input into this, as will Levy, the current first-team head coach and maybe one or two senior first team coaches, then a variety of Levy's advisors, which include various people he still talks to within the game.
Targets are decided and agreed but Lewis & Levy probably have the final say due to the financing of the deals. Once the targets are agreed, Baldini is sent with a maximum budget to close the deal.
I'd say Villa & Willian aside, which really couldn't be helped, we bagged every single major target last summer as well as receiving IMO ridiculously high values for our outgoing players.
Sending Ekotto on loan to QPR and not signing a left back was criminal WITH HINDSIGHT, but the club appears to have wanted to give Rose a chance in the first-team and AVB fell out with Ekotto. Not Baldini's fault IMO.
I'd say Baldini was and is doing a superb job so far.
how would you judge baldini's performance? I'd say:
1- a balanced first team squad with sufficient depth
2- an academy of talents that play the same way as the first eleven
And i find it hard to say that baldini has succeeded at either.
I even wonder if the club as a footballing system/ethos/philosophy that bridges the junior to senior squad.
Just looking at the same team playing so differently under AVB and Sherwood - I'd say a lack of one to unify the club management and performance on the pitch is something that needs to be looked at. I'd assumed that Baldini should be in charge at least of leading or faciliting this discussion and ensuring decisions. Otherwise how is he going to do his job well? So a third key performance indicator:
3- ensuring common footballing ethos/philposophy/system across senior and junior squad, and supporting club systems and processes.
Baldini was brought in as a deal-breaker as far as I can see.
As far as I can see, we operate a transfer committee to decide targets.
Baldini will have an input into this, as will Levy, the current first-team head coach and maybe one or two senior first team coaches, then a variety of Levy's advisors, which include various people he still talks to within the game.
Targets are decided and agreed but Lewis & Levy probably have the final say due to the financing of the deals. Once the targets are agreed, Baldini is sent with a maximum budget to close the deal.
I'd say Villa & Willian aside, which really couldn't be helped, we bagged every single major target last summer as well as receiving IMO ridiculously high values for our outgoing players.
Sending Ekotto on loan to QPR and not signing a left back was criminal WITH HINDSIGHT, but the club appears to have wanted to give Rose a chance in the first-team and AVB fell out with Ekotto. Not Baldini's fault IMO.
I'd say Baldini was and is doing a superb job so far.
Baldini was brought in as a deal-breaker as far as I can see.
As far as I can see, we operate a transfer committee to decide targets.
Baldini will have an input into this, as will Levy, the current first-team head coach and maybe one or two senior first team coaches, then a variety of Levy's advisors, which include various people he still talks to within the game.
Targets are decided and agreed but Lewis & Levy probably have the final say due to the financing of the deals. Once the targets are agreed, Baldini is sent with a maximum budget to close the deal.
I'd say Villa & Willian aside, which really couldn't be helped, we bagged every single major target last summer as well as receiving IMO ridiculously high values for our outgoing players.
Sending Ekotto on loan to QPR and not signing a left back was criminal WITH HINDSIGHT, but the club appears to have wanted to give Rose a chance in the first-team and AVB fell out with Ekotto. Not Baldini's fault IMO.
I'd say Baldini was and is doing a superb job so far.
What I want to see more of from Baldini this summer, is four or five 17-20 year olds arriving from Brazil, Argentina and Europe, who will go into the academy and then start filtering into the first team over the next few years.
Baldini was brought in as a deal-breaker as far as I can see.
As far as I can see, we operate a transfer committee to decide targets.
Baldini will have an input into this, as will Levy, the current first-team head coach and maybe one or two senior first team coaches, then a variety of Levy's advisors, which include various people he still talks to within the game.
Targets are decided and agreed but Lewis & Levy probably have the final say due to the financing of the deals. Once the targets are agreed, Baldini is sent with a maximum budget to close the deal.
I'd say Villa & Willian aside, which really couldn't be helped, we bagged every single major target last summer as well as receiving IMO ridiculously high values for our outgoing players.
Sending Ekotto on loan to QPR and not signing a left back was criminal WITH HINDSIGHT, but the club appears to have wanted to give Rose a chance in the first-team and AVB fell out with Ekotto. Not Baldini's fault IMO.
I'd say Baldini was and is doing a superb job so far.
What I want to see more of from Baldini this summer, is four or five 17-20 year olds arriving from Brazil, Argentina and Europe, who will go into the academy and then start filtering into the first team over the next few years.
This is extremely hard for us to do due to our work permit laws. Unless the player qualifies for an Italian/Spanish/Portuguese passport then they are reasonably unlikely to be granted a work permit unless they are already a full international.
Don't we have a Belgian feeder club we can use for that?
Standard Liege isn't it?
I think we have a 'relationship' with a Belgian club.... (the Fryers signing seemed to demonstrate that - was that Standard Liege?).
Other than that Fryers signing it doesn't seem to be a relationship that we have really used so far. Also Isn't it more the African nations that the Belgium work permit rules are relaxed for? (or have i just made that up?)
I think it was Liege. Not sure about belgian work permits, you may be right - I know they've been used for african players a lot, is it Portugal where they do the same for South Americans?
Where did this whole notion that we have a 'transfer committee' come about? Is it something that has come directly out of the club or just the media?
Where did this whole notion that we have a 'transfer committee' come about? Is it something that has come directly out of the club or just the media?