SpiderSpurs
Ryan Nelsen
Too young to remember the last days of Scholar?Maybe because they REALLY think they can make a change by waving a couple of home made banners about.
I suggest a little history lesson may be in order, youngling.
Too young to remember the last days of Scholar?Maybe because they REALLY think they can make a change by waving a couple of home made banners about.
I didn't gripe, I gave mine up to no bluster at all (maybe only 3rd time I have mentioned it on here). I have an idea of what I feel is value for money and manoeuvre elsewhere me thats going to next years ashes instead.I'm not going to argue against a mans opinion re ticket pricing, but with a new stadium and the demand for tickets that we have whoever the owners are/were they would be in the same bracket. That's a general gripe at the way football has changed imv but you're entitled to point the finger where you see fit
GHod forbid, pulling in the same directionI really don't understand how on one hand you can say the manager is in a rebuild, needs to be given time and should be judged on that accordingly while also shifting position on the club who are orchestrating the rebuild - if we are rebuilding then everyone needs the time to be judged accordingly.
Another one for your auto-correct list!
Hmmmm..... Pochettino finally got a bit of money to spend and then sacked.Two of your opinions as I understand them are that:
- Poch didn't get a rebuild (agreed)
- Mourinho was appointed as an alternative to rebuilding (agreed)
That brings us to Paratichi - Paratichi led in to the Lange era so at most we're looking at this being a second rebuild but in reality it's a continuation of what Paratichi started. So no not the 4th or 5th rebuild as you have tried to paint it as.
I find this a weird narrative.I think now as a customer base where it feels transactional more than ever (I jacked my ST in because I am a firm believer of you touch yourself you makes your choice), I can see why people now feel there is a need to voice their opinion. We all know Enic are going nowhere but for the first time in a while I am sided with the fans who feel they wanna have a rant about it.
That's fine, it's a personal choice so I don't expect everyone to get it and I find that OK.I find this a weird narrative.
I've been a game going fan since 86/87.
What I have done through the decades is exactly the same. Paid my money for a ticket (or on the turnstile) entered the ground and had fun/a laugh/delirium/excitement/sadness/misery/heartbreak delete as appropriate.
The way the club 'treats' me has very little to do with whichever of those outcomes come to pass on a match day.
How wounded can one be if they have a client reference number? Would a fan number be better? Am I upset that chirpy is no longer up to mischief on matchdays?
A ST or member relationship with the club has been pretty much what it is now ie a pack thru the door every year.
What else are you hoping for in this area?
Prices have in relative terms risen. But it safe to say so have the costs for the club. The costs we are always on the back of the club to pay.
I'd suggest a greater reason for disillusionment with going, and dis-attachment are those around you. The mindset is based in negativity and moaning (in the main).
The club structured the stadium to give us an amazing single tier 'home stand' , and what do we do with it?
I watch so many games from abroad (and I'm not sure if this is an English fan problem, not just Spurs) where the supporters are fully bought in, visually ,sonically and emotionally.
While Spurs were indeed a PLC, Sugar owned a majority of the shares giving him a controlling stake. He sold his shares to ENIC after the pressure that came from the fans.different era, PLC at time, revenue was much more about buts in the seat.
It's extremely unlikely that local fans can in anyway influence change of ownership in a non PLC model. United has a very organized model (comparatively) that have been staging protest against Glazers for how long now? zero, literally zero effect.
And that isn't even getting to the type of people who turn up at these protests
So, are you saying it's just a finance (value) thing? Is the way the club interfaces with you an issue?That's fine, it's a personal choice so I don't expect everyone to get it and I find that OK.
I can afford the increases, comfortably I just don't find the cost and associated costs value for money anymore, honestly it's as simple as that no more no less.
I don't think the PL product as a whole is worth what's being asked, I find 90% of it trash if I am honest.
I actually asked myself that before I decided and honestly even if success came along I don't see the cost is value. As I say I don't see it PL wide if I'm honest, the product isn't as good as the PR IMOSo, are you saying it's just a finance (value) thing? Is the way the club interfaces with you an issue?
Does the 'value for money' assessment fluctuate if we are doing well? Or is it nothing to do with that ie you compare it to other things you could spend your money on?
Hmmmm..... Pochettino finally got a bit of money to spend and then sacked.
Mourinho then got a some money to spend and was then sacked.
Nuno then got a bit of money to spend and was sacked
Conte then got some money to spend and was then sacked
Postecoglou then got quite a bit of money to spend.
The 5 managers above, all have rather different ways of shaping their team compared to the others in the list. The players purchased for the previous manager's style of football are often not a good fit for the next manager coming in. I think it is fair to say that we have started 5 rebuilds and finished none.
I wish.Too young to remember the last days of Scholar?
I suggest a little history lesson may be in order, youngling.
While Spurs were indeed a PLC, Sugar owned a majority of the shares giving him a controlling stake. He sold his shares to ENIC after the pressure that came from the fans.
I must've imagined Sir Jim Radcliffe buying about 28% of Man Utd recently!
I don't get you at all?Mate, just hold your hands up that you were embellishing for effect ffs
No idea. All I know is that they protested for a long while and something changed. Might be coincidence, might not be.You think that was fan pressure? it's more Glaziers monetizing even more and taking less responsibility
I don't get you at all?
You disagree that we have gone through 5 permanent managers quite quickly and had all of them start a rebuild only to cut that short every time up to the current manager who is less than a season and a half in?
We didn't rebuild after Poch, we delayed and delayed because we thought the squad was good enough. You have made this very argument against the club many times over those years yourself. We didn't face up to the reality until we brought in Paratichi, Lange has then continued on from where he left off.
But what Romero said, still holds true. He's just simply saying that if things don't work out, then you go again....and again....and again. In many ways, he was saying that this is the new Spurs.
Poch got lambasted over Ndombele, but in reality Richi has cost as much and has had a very similar contribution. The difference now is that we're beyond the stadium build and COVID. One or two poor expensive purchases won't derail us like it did with Rebrov, Soldado etc.
Ditto with a change in 1st team coach, even though that is not the right call at the moment.
Slight nitpick, Richi's issues is injuries, not burgers ..
Point remains, we need to keep improving the squad, to me Richi, Bissouma, even Maddison are potential first team upgrades, LB, 2nd GK, RW are squad depth improvements