Mikey10
Jimmy Neighbour
Interesting. Extremely rich person finds ways to make it look like he doesn’t own something.
More relevantly, extremely rich person finds a way to protect his assets from any forfeiture.Interesting. Extremely rich person finds ways to make it look like he doesn’t own something.
So where are the moral police now?
Seriously? For every winner there is a loser. Those trading on insider information are ensuring they will be the winner. The loser will then often be pension funds and such like.Is insider trading a big deal morally? I mean in terms of corporate/financial law i get why it would be a big no no, but otherwise - not sure why anyone should care or find it morally suspect.
Is insider trading a big deal morally? I mean in terms of corporate/financial law i get why it would be a big no no, but otherwise - not sure why anyone should care or find it morally suspect.
To be fair @billyiddo was asking the question. He didn't make a sweeping statement about how it wasn't a big deal....No offence I think you are out of your depth here with that comment. I'll leave it at that to avoid a long lecturing post.
Seriously? For every winner there is a loser. Those trading on insider information are ensuring they will be the winner. The loser will then often be pension funds and such like.
It's not great, but it's far more common than most people think.Is insider trading a big deal morally? I mean in terms of corporate/financial law i get why it would be a big no no, but otherwise - not sure why anyone should care or find it morally suspect.
It's not great, but it's far more common than most people think.
In the table of bad brick done by PL club owners, we still come up way short of City and Saudi Sportswashing Machine, probably a few others too.
Corruption is corruption no matter how you dress it up. Silly to think one form of it is palatable and comparing it to others.
Never got a tip in a horse race and shared it with your mates?
Tbh i don't care what happens to lewis. Lock him up or don't. Sure some dirt will be brought up over the course of the trial.
Would you rather someone slightly devalued one of your shares or stoned you to death for being gay?Corruption is corruption no matter how you dress it up. Silly to think one form of it is palatable and comparing it to others.
The suggestion is that he loaned investment money to them and then took some of the profits.Lewis doesn't seem to be the beneficiary of the insider information. Some friends and associates made a few millions, amounts that he wouldn't even notice. Why would he do it? I suspect a significant fraction of gains made by short selling are based on inside information (rather than lucky bets) so perhaps this is like getting Al Capone on his taxes.
I think if we want to look at the morality of financial deals, his shorting of the pound before Black Wednesday is a bigger "crime" and did far more damage.
He's also nothing to do with ENIC either according to reports:
Would you rather someone slightly devalued one of your shares or stoned you to death for being gay?
It is fairly minimal in the scheme of things.Neither are palatable ... love how you are trying to minimise the allegation