viscount thurso
Gregorz Rasiak
No, but I’m not ruling out the post-interim interim being sacked once Utd and Liverpool kick our arses.
No, but I’m not ruling out the post-interim interim being sacked once Utd and Liverpool kick our arses.
Not sure if serious?
Chelsea fired their interim a few weeks ago, and they may fire his replacement as well.
It's a circus, but it isn't the only circus in town
This is such a twist of facts.Not sure if serious?
Chelsea fired their interim a few weeks ago, and they may fire his replacement as well.
It's a circus, but it isn't the only circus in town
And the farce continues.
Stellini gets sacked and we are back to Mason.
What a joke of a board.
Have you guys ever seen an interim sacked?
It's a joke.
Would you prefer we kept them?
This is such a twist of facts.
Why are you defending levy?
Potter was sacked and Frank lampard was hired to replace the interim.
Spurs' situation is different. I just don't get the blind bias.
No but why didn't he go with Mason once Conte was sacked? That's who I thought he was going with. At least Levy knew Mason from his previous stint. While He had no idea about how Stellini will do.Would you prefer we kept them?
No but why didn't he go with Mason once Conte was sacked? That's who I thought he was going with. At least Levy knew Mason from his previous stint. While He had no idea about how Stellini will do.
GB mentioned it earlier, the expectation (what was being said) was Mason's wife was expecting at the time of Conte's removal and he was expected to go on paternity leave.
Not sure if serious?
Chelsea fired their interim a few weeks ago, and they may fire his replacement as well.
It's a circus, but it isn't the only circus in town
I am sorry mate I think you are a great poster but that is a desperate defence of the Spurs regime. I think people will be more sympathetic of Chelsea's predicament. They employed a dodgy Russian who was forced to give up his ownership quickly. Boehly came in, not really understanding the English football market and has made some mistakes but it's been what a year of ownership to arrive at their circus. Levy has been operating at Spurs 20 years and has made a series of really poor footballing decisions over a number of years that have resulted in our circus.
I am sorry mate I think you are a great poster but that is a desperate defence of the Spurs regime. I think people will be more sympathetic of Chelsea's predicament. They employed a dodgy Russian who was forced to give up his ownership quickly. Boehly came in, not really understanding the English football market and has made some mistakes but it's been what a year of ownership to arrive at their circus. Levy has been operating at Spurs 20 years and has made a series of really poor footballing decisions over a number of years that have resulted in our circus.
It's fairly hard to have a plan when who is available is constantly changing, it would need to be updated every few weeks with constant checking of who is interested.It's not a defense mate, someone asked a question, i answered, in light of the fact that Chelsea literally made that decision this month, the "has anyone done this before" seems a bit odd.
The club is in a bad place but pretending that no other club has ever fired an interim coach or using interim managers to stack the number of coaching appointments in last 4 years is reaching and unnecessary.
Jose -> Nuno -> Conte is a bad track record of decisions, failure to have a plan other than internal hold on knowing how volatile Conte was is also a bad call.
But for someone to have a legitimate conversation we "need" to dress it up in a "has any other club ever done this"? actually yes, probably, probably multiple times if anyone could be arsed to look.
It's not a defense mate, someone asked a question, i answered, in light of the fact that Chelsea literally made that decision this month, the "has anyone done this before" seems a bit odd.
The club is in a bad place but pretending that no other club has ever fired an interim coach or using interim managers to stack the number of coaching appointments in last 4 years is reaching and unnecessary.
Jose -> Nuno -> Conte is a bad track record of decisions, failure to have a plan other than internal hold on knowing how volatile Conte was is also a bad call.
But for someone to have a legitimate conversation we "need" to dress it up in a "has any other club ever done this"? actually yes, probably, probably multiple times if anyone could be arsed to look.
If it's coming off as defensive to more than one person, then well, you do the math.
Obviously it has happened before, but to call it odd, comes off as you clutching at straws and being a little bit petty. This is beside the point and deflecting from the point of the conversation, but they appointed their interim coach bruno saltor and he didnt want the job. In the meantime they were looking for another manager.
We appointed Stellini and then sacked him. Suggesting Mason didnt get the job because his wife was giving birth is also crazy (especially since there was a 2 week international break, at the time).
You have now twisted the truth twice to try and prove a point.
So how is Mason being appointed now in that case?Believe what you want mate
- I gave you a Chelsea statement, but you know better, actual club quotes is me twisting the truth
- I said it was reported at the time, go look through the threads (I can't be arsed) and you will see it commented re Mason and the wife (are you saying I faked his wife having birth as well? 4th April if you want to check) by others, and it was suggested he was taking paternity leave (which in case you don't know is potentially months) not just for the birth.
So how is Mason being appointed now in that case?
The paternity leave thing was a suggestion by someone else as cover for us waiting for PochBut either Mason isn’t being appointed because he is taking paternity leave or he isn’t taking paternity leave and can be appointed…. Or does Mason have Schrödinger’s Maternity Leave?