been enough lightweight performances in the league to discount that as a possibility
Apart from leicester and villa who have we lost to in the league?
been enough lightweight performances in the league to discount that as a possibility
Everything's incentivised according to bloke I worked with. CL qualification in players contracts (not all of them). There is also a players pool if they qualify which is split between them, last years was 3m+. FA Cup and league cup also incentivised with players bonus pool
Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
Just a thought (full blown conspiracy mode, but i'm tinkled). I believe levy said we had the biggest bonuses for players in the prem. I wonder how they are weighted?
If they are heavily weighted for getting a cl place, could that be a reason why our players seem to be lightweight in the cups? Save themselves for league games?
Apart from leicester and villa who have we lost to in the league?
Sugar was right because he only thought about the business. It was probably needed at the time tooNot sure if this is the right place for it. Just found this on YouTube. I remember us being in serious financial trouble and Sugar’s fight with the FA but I never knew the details of what went on. fudge me, how we avoided automatic relegation is a mystery especially after what happened to Swindon around that time. We were in it up to our necks.
I also remember the vitriol directed at Sugar when he fired Venables. While, like most fans, I was on Venables’ side, it was poisonous. I think history has shown that Sugar was right.
Say what you like about Levy and Sugar but we really were run by absolute crooks for a time.
So was there an Ardiles sized connection between the financial troubles of Spurs and Swindon?I was always pro Venebles at the time but you learn more and now I'm always thankful for his footballing time but Sugar was huge in saving the club and he was right about Saint Venebles.
Crazy times that the manager had full control of contracts
Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
Not sure TBH, probably worth a gander, Hoddle was there for a while too ey but imagine that was after that time, not sure on the timelines of Swindons woesSo was there an Ardiles sized connection between the financial troubles of Spurs and Swindon?
Sugar did a massive thing for us.
Wouldn’t want him back, but credit where it’s due.
Isn't that the situation now with Paratici looking after the football side?It’s never gonna happen, but Levy should stay to run the business - at which he is brilliant (if your metric for running a business is making money and raising the profile of a ‘brand’) - and let someone who knows football run the football side. I think @scaramanga is available.
But a signing like Spence, which apparently Levy was in charge of, whom conte very publicly said was a ‘club signing’ suggests otherwise.Isn't that the situation now with Paratici looking after the football side?
There seems to be lots of improvements since he joined.
It doesn't suggest otherwise. Conte has repeatedly said that it was a club signing that he agreed with as one for the future.But a signing like Spence, which apparently Levy was in charge of, whom conte very publicly said was a ‘club signing’ suggests otherwise.
Isn't that the situation now with Paratici looking after the football side?
There seems to be lots of improvements since he joined.