• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Daniel Levy - Chairman

Yes but havertz wouldn't have been injured.
Didn’t Arsenal already have an agreement with Palace and Eze from earlier in the window and Arsenal just put it on ice? Wasn’t we all under the impression they needed to sell to sign Eze and then we got involved and it was now or never? They will make a sale or 2 by the end of the window which will balance the books for the Eze buy. IMO they were always going to sign him this window.
 
Didn’t Arsenal already have an agreement with Palace and Eze from earlier in the window and Arsenal just put it on ice? Wasn’t we all under the impression they needed to sell to sign Eze and then we got involved and it was now or never? They will make a sale or 2 by the end of the window which will balance the books for the Eze buy. IMO they were always going to sign him this window.

Thought they dropped the interest to go after gyorkeres.

It's rumour. We'll probably never know the truth.
 
Hahah yeh i roostered up....here comes the edit (that's not an album)
I wasn't sure, I vaguely remember bopping along to it in my white van back in the 90s. I'm vaguely familiar with the cure but have no clue about the cult so wanted to check if the old brain cells were playing tricks on me.
 
Kudus, johnson...

There is a pecking order though. If cuty, arsenal, chelsea, liverpool were in for any of them we'd have probably missed out.

The problem is we should move faster to get the deals done.

Isn't it in the interest of the selling club to stretch it out to see if someone else comes in to buy? When I was working I never signed a contract without negotiation and had as many offers as I could get.
 
Isn't it in the interest of the selling club to stretch it out to see if someone else comes in to buy? When I was working I never signed a contract without negotiation and had as many offers as I could get.

Unless you miss out on the deal. If the buyer says this is my highest offer take it or leave it. Then it's up to the seller to take the deal or not.
As a buyer you should never have just one option.
 
Is it history repeating itself though?

Let’s look at the last few attempts on Eze level players.

Proven PL performers at lower clubs.

Solanke, Maddison, Bissouma, Richarlison.

We get more done than we don’t.
sounds brutal but it feels like top tier players won't choose spurs
winning europa is not good enough
 
Unless you miss out on the deal. If the buyer says this is my highest offer take it or leave it. Then it's up to the seller to take the deal or not.
As a buyer you should never have just one option.

We, nor any off the shysters on social media know what Tottenham are doing or have plans for if a deal cannot be brokered, but I certainly feel we have alternative targets for some players, it wouldn't seem reasonable to be negotiating with other clubs while going for our primary choice as we might be considered timewasters if nothing comes of it.
 
Back