Well it's acted like most other new viruses so far, so why wouldn't it?
Be a bit of brick virus if it kills all its hosts.
Covid doesn't kill all it's hosts though does it. It kills less than 1%.
Well it's acted like most other new viruses so far, so why wouldn't it?
Be a bit of brick virus if it kills all its hosts.
Are they just testing loads more though, because the eyes of the world are on them?
Snore.Covid doesn't kill all it's hosts though does it. It kills less than 1%.
Are they just testing loads more though, because the eyes of the world are on them?
The point from @Lilbaz important because the 1% (I think slightly higher actually) reduces the selective pressure on it to dial down its virulence. It's too early to make any firm conclusions around the virulence of Omicron, although as you say early signs are promising.Snore.
The point from @Lilbaz important because the 1% (I think slightly higher actually) reduces the selective pressure on it to dial down its virulence. It's too early to make any firm conclusions around the virulence of Omicron, although as you say early signs are promising.
The snore comment wasn't about the stats, it was about ignoring the general point.The point from @Lilbaz important because the 1% (I think slightly higher actually) reduces the selective pressure on it to dial down its virulence. It's too early to make any firm conclusions around the virulence of Omicron, although as you say early signs are promising.
The snore comment wasn't about the stats, it was about ignoring the general point.
The 1% is relevant - viruses primary objective is to survive, so to mutate to become more/same virulent in the face of increased immunity would mean it acting like no other virus. There is little evidence thus far that Covid 19 will do this - instead finding its natural rate within its host community, as opposed to killing them. Covids pool of hosts isn't all of humanity, it's everyone it infects at one point in time - the more of those that die, the smaller the possibility of transmission, and therefore survival of the virus. Transmission isn't 100%.
Fair point.Examples of other viruses ifr:
Rabies 100%
Ebola 50%
Polio 15%
Chicken pox 0.8%.
None of these have mutated to be mild.
Examples of other viruses ifr:
Rabies 100%
Ebola 50%
Polio 15%
Chicken pox 0.8%.
None of these have mutated to be mild. Or milder than covid at least.
Fair point.
I was talking about viruses that transmit in similar ways/rates.
If any of the above spread like C19, it's hosts would be wiped out very quickly, thus killing itself - which is something it won't do, unless it's very different to anything before; and if it is, we'll never know, because we're all fudged.
Fair point.
I was talking about viruses that transmit in similar ways/rates.
If any of the above spread like C19, it's hosts would be wiped out very quickly, thus killing itself - which is something it won't do, unless it's very different to anything before; and if it is, we'll never know, because we're all fudged.
The logical thing to go on is the 6 previous coronaviruses. The first 4 evolved into the common cold and SARS and MERS never got a strong foothold. So the logical path is to common cold, once it settles down and humanity's collective immunity gets trained.
Has there been any data on flu so far for this year.The ifr for delta is now lower than flu in the uk.