ricky2tricky4city
Steffen Freund
The furry cup?
The furry cup?
So reports today that U.K. leads vaccine race. All that after all the negativity about us being so far behind in the “race”
I haven't read the paper yet, but this is the only article describing it in this way. Have you seen anything else like this?I’m not sure we’re too far ahead. Not a write-off, but much to do.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/willia...ord-covid-vaccine-work-in-monkeys-not-really/
Didn't we drop £84m on it today?I haven't read the paper yet, but this is the only article describing it in this way. Have you seen anything else like this?
It's also a very good example of why these things shouldn't be rushed. Who is investing the "make it just in case" money? I sincerely hope it's not the taxpayer.
If the article above is accurate, I sincerely hope not.Didn't we drop £84m on it today?
Think it actually said 'additional £84m'If the article above is accurate, I sincerely hope not.
FFS. This is why the govt shouldn't pick winners.Think it actually said 'additional £84m'
Jesus Wept, absolute fudgewits
About 30 people attended an outdoor baby shower - complete with "a bouncy castle full of children" - despite lockdown rules, police have said.
They were sitting in a communal play area outside their homes in Morecambe on Saturday, officers said on Facebook.
When asked to leave by police community support officers (PCSOs), three partygoers "became abusive and stated that it didn't matter because the schools were going back in June".
They ran away when police were called.
Lancashire Police said: "One particularly uncaring individual stated, 'Well we're all going to get it, so what's the point?' and refused to follow the PCSOs' advice."
Police said the three people who fled were "presumably more concerned about receiving a fine than giving someone else a potentially fatal disease"
Teachers still refusing to engage on talks whilst picking up full pay for doing less work from home.
Imagine your boss asked you into the office for a chat and you just sat there and refused.Teachers still refusing to engage on talks whilst picking up full pay for doing less work from home.
I haven't read the paper yet, but this is the only article describing it in this way. Have you seen anything else like this?
It's also a very good example of why these things shouldn't be rushed. Who is investing the "make it just in case" money? I sincerely hope it's not the taxpayer.
Imagine your boss asked you into the office for a chat and you just sat there and refused.
How long would you last?
I haven't read the paper yet, but this is the only article describing it in this way. Have you seen anything else like this?
It's also a very good example of why these things shouldn't be rushed. Who is investing the "make it just in case" money? I sincerely hope it's not the taxpayer.
Didn't we drop £84m on it today?
Fine, you pay for it then.£84m is nothing in the scheme of things presently.
Personal interest was my immediate assumption - sounded a lot like someone doing down a competitor.He focuses on issues with the Oxford one, which are all stated in their paper. In contrast he isn't critical of the Sinovac study at all. The Science commentary he links to has some comments from people critical of the Sinovac study, so neither seem perfect, which is not surprising for vaccines being produced and tested so quickly. The article seems peculiarly one sided. It could just be that he only likes the one-fashioned types of vaccines or perhaps he has a personal interest.