This article pretty much sums it up for me:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...whether-this-cure-is-actually-worse-3t97k66vj
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...whether-this-cure-is-actually-worse-3t97k66vj
Because the more you travel around, the more people you risk coming into contact with, the more risk of contracting/passing on the virus. Social distancing in itself isn't actually enough. It's a rule put in place to avoid a total lockdown,but it doesn't prevent the virus being picked up from a common surface (eg. petrol pump, assuming she drove and would have needed fuel at some point), and likely doesn't prevent airborne particles being passed on (would need to be more than 2m apart).
And not least of course she's the CMO telling people not to travel. Therefore she needs to demonstrate she can follow her own instructions or why should anyone else?
You’re increasing the frequency you need to get petrol and either pick up or pass on the virus at the pumps (virus hot spot).Yeh suppose, I get the severity but if I have house A and House B and I go from one to another without contact on leaving my car the risk is minimal.
Yeh suppose, I get the severity but if I have house A and House B and I go from one to another without contact on leaving my car the risk is minimal.
At least Kyle Walker's managing to entertain himself whilst #stayingathome
Awful looking hooker too, surely he could afford to go high endAt least Kyle Walker's managing to entertain himself whilst #stayingathome
I don’t know why they are contemplating preventing people from exercising when it’s the groups collecting at beaches, parks, etc that are the problem.
People exercising should be encouraged to do so. Those with the power to control the public should spend more time at the places outlined above, as the photos taken there this weekend suggest little action is being taken around these apparent social gatherings.
Awful looking hooker too, surely he could afford to go high end
He lives in the north, high end is just another term for "doesn't have fur"Awful looking hooker too, surely he could afford to go high end
Think that makes sense.I don’t know why they are contemplating preventing people from exercising when it’s the groups collecting at beaches, parks, etc that are the problem.
People exercising should be encouraged to do so. Those with the power to control the public should spend more time at the places outlined above, as the photos taken there this weekend suggest little action is being taken around these apparent social gatherings.
Because this govt likes everything to be "in the name of the people" so they can reduce the PR hit.I don’t know why they are contemplating preventing people from exercising when it’s the groups collecting at beaches, parks, etc that are the problem.
People exercising should be encouraged to do so. Those with the power to control the public should spend more time at the places outlined above, as the photos taken there this weekend suggest little action is being taken around these apparent social gatherings.
Yeh suppose, I get the severity but if I have house A and House B and I go from one to another without contact on leaving my car the risk is minimal.
Just don't crash. I do that all the time.You also run the risk of crashing your car and taking up valuable medical resources getting fixed up (if serious)
Another government possibly losing its nerve then. I say possibly as the Grauniad has had it in for their plan from the start - I suspect because it gives them a stick to beat the UK govt with if it fails.For those who wondered how Sweden’s experiment in herd immunity would work out, looks like they’ve realised they have to join the rest of us...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...s-as-death-toll-climbs?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other