I haven't missed the point of your post, I was just questioning it. I agree Townsend isn't good enough. My point in mentioning Townsend is that you are always critical of him,even when he hasn't had a bad game. Clinton made many basic mistakes which I have no doubt you would have happily pointed out if was Townsend,yet you labelled his performance relatively excellent which I was surprised at. You have kind of qualified what your assessment was based on but I still think was over the top. He was ok, and showed some promise but wasn't anything special at all. Anyway, I think we agree with the fundamentals - Townsend isn't good enough, and Clinton has good potential...