afsoc4life
Vedran Corluka
Tried his best yesterday but as with the rest of the team - we didnt look better until our formation changed.
I think with Eriksen, it becomes difficult to have a balanced conversation at times before someone from either end of the like spectrum gets quite defensive about why he is or isn't as good as why we want him to be. I am fairly middle of the road with Eriksen and have no axe to grind.
I personally think overall, he has had a generally poor season but then in the last 6 weeks or so, yesterday aside, has been exceptional. The one major fault that I have with him and it isn't specifically something that can be rectified is that he is less able to recover compared to most in the squad once he has lost the ball or come off second best in a duel. That is just how it is and you can't make a player suddenly more agile and athletic and I don't know that you can change the way he challenges in a standing 50/50 where he kind of dangles a leg and then when he doesn't win the ball he is effectively out of the game and unable to recover.
As I say, its not a criticism as such because I don't think he can improve those areas, he is physically how he is and you can't coat him off for that but I can see why at times people who are at the end of the don't like spectrum get quite frustrated when he hasn't perhaps contributed over a lengthy period whilst I can also appreciate that people who really like him and see what else he offers get frustrated when they have to defend that fact.
Technically Eriksen is a great player and when on song, he is a highly valuable member of the squad, but he is also a bit spineless, when things get physical.
It wasnt physical as in lots of hard tackles, but city did have a lot of deliberately late tackles, niggly ones and on the edge leaving the foot in type of "clashes".Yesterday wasn't physical though... probably the least physical team we have played
The issue was we didn't get a platform in midfield for our attacking players to get involved from
It changed when we went back to 4-2-3-1 and low and behold Sen had a decent foothold in the second half because of it
I'm not sure erisken can do a huge amount without the ball and unless endroooed back to centre back yesterday he didn't have much opportunity to show the physical side you talk about
I'm not saying he had a good game but your creative players need something to play off
It wasnt physical as in lots of hard tackles, but city did have a lot of deliberately late tackles, niggly ones and on the edge leaving the foot in type of "clashes".
Eriksen isn't going to get involved in that, not criticising, it's just not his game.
The problem looked to me like it was when we tried to play out no one made time or space to receive the ball and get it forward effectively.
We got swamped and harassed between the Base you mention and eriksen and dele. On the few occasions we did we got fouled or hustled off the ball, breaking up any chance of momentum we had.
Yesterday wasn't physical though... probably the least physical team we have played
The issue was we didn't get a platform in midfield for our attacking players to get involved from
It changed when we went back to 4-2-3-1 and low and behold Sen had a decent foothold in the second half because of it
I'm not sure erisken can do a huge amount without the ball and unless he moved back to centre back yesterday he didn't have much opportunity to show the physical side you talk about
I'm not saying he had a good game but your creative players need something to play off
What? City applied a high press, gave our players no time on the ball and were physical, bordering on dirty. People were surprised that they didn't get more yellow cards. They left the foot in numerous times, as Rose and Walker would probably testify.
Lol I saw an underhit pass that ended up behind KaneA subtle but vital contribution to the second goal - received the ball, drove forward instead of playing it safe and slipped a nice little ball into Kane to lay off to Son....
Haha you old cynic....Lol I saw an underhit pass that ended up behind Kane
Sent from my SM-T819Y using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
It wasnt physical as in lots of hard tackles, but city did have a lot of deliberately late tackles, niggly ones and on the edge leaving the foot in type of "clashes".
Eriksen isn't going to get involved in that, not criticising, it's just not his game.
The problem looked to me like it was when we tried to play out no one made time or space to receive the ball and get it forward effectively.
We got swamped and harassed between the Base you mention and eriksen and dele. On the few occasions we did we got fouled or hustled off the ball, breaking up any chance of momentum we had.
It's a continental thing to my mind, they are so much better at it than us. small disruptive fouls that ecsasperate and cause you to lose focus. Man u did it to is too. We really miss Lamela for these games, he's the only one we have that knows how to combat it.This! I have NEVER had a Guardiola love-in for this reason. His teams might be pretty blah blah, but they are also niggly and dirty. I thought Marriner had a poor game in this regard, missing several nasty challenges, including the Sane one on Walker which could've been a red. I still cannot wrap my head around the fact that few pundits want to acknowledge that Stering was OFFSIDE! Grrrrr....re: Eriksen, I think his improvement in the last 6 weeks has been strong and I think he might well get even stronger.
A subtle but vital contribution to the second goal - received the ball, drove forward instead of playing it safe and slipped a nice little ball into Kane to lay off to Son....
Yesterday wasn't physical though... probably the least physical team we have played
The issue was we didn't get a platform in midfield for our attacking players to get involved from
It changed when we went back to 4-2-3-1 and low and behold Sen had a decent foothold in the second half because of it
I'm not sure erisken can do a huge amount without the ball and unless he moved back to centre back yesterday he didn't have much opportunity to show the physical side you talk about
I'm not saying he had a good game but your creative players need something to play off