Fair enough. If it's an outright declaration of a price you were looking for, then I apologise, that wasn't what I intended to convey. I believe there is more than just speculation behind the consistency of the press when it comes to reporting the facts of this transfer saga: they've all said the same thing across the board, even the BBC (which checks its sources more frequently than most of the other news sources out there). You don't. I believe that failing to secure our manager's primary, 'must-have' target, despite being burned by that occurrence with the last permanent guy...I believe that's a failure. You don't. Again, fair enough, they're differing enough viewpoints that I won't try to change your opinion on them.
No problem, but how do we know that this was a 'must have' signing, or his primary target? Just because he'd managed him before, does that have to be the case? He had assessed our squad then we make our move in signing some defensive players. Would it not be more likely that Poch had decided the defensive area was more important, where as we already had a lot more and better quality options at CM so Morgan was a 'nice to have' rather than a crucial necessity signing for him? None of us know Poch was desperate to sign him, more of an assumption just because he worked with him and turned him into a class player....