Bad pundit world cup - Owen Hargreaves v Thierry Henry

[milo]

A couple of new boys now with Owen Hargreaves taking on Thierry Henry but who is worse?

 

[the dza]

All Henry goes on about is players being "addit."

 

[Mikey10]

Ouch. A real toughy. Hargreaves is about as pleasurable to listen to as nails down a blackboard , but Henry has the insight of a cabbage.

I'm going to go for the former though, as his bizarre accent just gives him the edge.

 

[Jordinho]

Henry wins it because I cannot understand the words that are coming out of his mouth.

 

[Lemonade Money]

Boring nob vs boring nob. Being a gooner tips the balance.

 

[Seedy Ron]

Hargreaves' has a really irritating delivery, like he's trying to make himself sound bright, which is clearly a losing battle.

 

[Rorschach]

Henry can't string a coherent sentence together. And he is a cheating clam. And a goon. And a bean head. And smells of garlic.

 

[Gazza]

Whadd i am saying ...

You know whadd i mean ...


No you clam you are on tv to explain what you are saying we are not mind readers.

 

[scaramanga]

Henry wins it because I cannot understand the words that are coming out of his mouth.

That goes for both, but Terry Henry is worse.

 

[Daisuk]

Henry is still a clam.

 

[DaveYid]

Both offer nothing but Henry wins it for me due to the ridiculous over the top fanfare he was given when joining Sky.

 

[Baleforce]

Both offer nothing but Henry wins it for me due to the ridiculous over the top fanfare he was given when joining Sky.

couldn't decide until I read that, exactly right

 

[Aldo]

Henry is a clam, whatever he does.
He was a clam as a player.
He'd be a clam of a plumber, a clam of a barrister, a clam of a taxi driver.

He's chosen to be a pundit. And he's a clam at it.

 

[milo]

A couple of hours left to vote

 

[milo]

Henry walks it

 

[nayimfromthehalfwayline]

Genuinley tough one to call. Would actually vote for both if I could.

Hargreaves has an arrogance about him, talks as though he was Zidane as a player, and as though he will be Fergie as a manager (just as soon as someone worthy offers him a job). And when it comes down to it its an entirely unearned arrogance because his "insight" is as hollow as every other pundit.

Henry is similar, has arrogance (albeit of a more conceited kind) but somehow offers even less insight (genuinely bottom of the barrell) as well as being an enormous clam. Henry wins, but Id rather they both go through!