• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Antonin Kinsky

I hope I'm wrong, but I worry about this, I think he's levels behind Vic and its a mistake to think he is good enough to be our starting keeper, but it looks like that is whats happening.
 
Kane said:
We signed him last year on a six and a half year deal(?).
If that’s true, wouldn’t have necessarily thought a new contract was of the utmost urgency at this particular juncture? As in, make him the starter now and give him a season or so to offer more clarity?
Click to expand...

He probably had a release clause in the contract and this was to remove it. They have always been common among young goalkeepers.
 
SissokoWasGood (BoL) said:
Also, simply to demonstrate our commitment to him as number 1 by boosting his wages. And to demonstrate to other players that we’ll do right by them when they progress even if we had them on longer terms.
Click to expand...

Yep. He probably had a clause in his contract already that would kick in if he got a certain number of Prem games and this just gets ahead of it. Also sends a message to the young players in the squad that if you do prove yourself you will be rewarded at a time when Bergvall & Vuskovic are wanting to jump ship rather than fight for their spot.

Goalkeeping is a unique position. Everywhere else on the pitch commotion for places pushes those players to perform better. At Goalkeeper, it’s actually the opposite more often than not. I genuinely beleive Kinsky will perform even better due to the confidence RDZ has given him and just play regular football again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back