• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Another shooting in Murica

Above, Matt Schafer says " YES to praying for victims. YES to praying for protection. YES to praying that GHod would transform the hearts of people with evil intent."

Is it a parody account, or do American politicians genuinely get away with things like that?
 
Can I get a 'hell yeah' for this clam being shot in the face?








(I an obviously joking internet overlords, chill out)
I never wish harm to other people, but I'd like to see how those thoughts and prayers are working, if someone gunned down his entire family!

fudging looneys!
 
Above, Matt Schafer says " YES to praying for victims. YES to praying for protection. YES to praying that GHod would transform the hearts of people with evil intent."

Is it a parody account, or do American politicians genuinely get away with things like that?
Donald Trump is their president.....
The whole place is a fudging parody!
 
Just let them kill each other. What's the problem?

You could argue that the victims, those not part of this "let's all kill each other" festival, you know, the ones who don't bring guns to this party, don't find your solution problem free.

sandyhook_victimsmontage.jpg
 
Then the relations, friends and those who care about the 'needless' loss need to stop voting for tacos like Trump.
 
You could argue that the victims, those not part of this "let's all kill each other" festival, you know, the ones who don't bring guns to this party, don't find your solution problem free.

sandyhook_victimsmontage.jpg

Someone (on twitter possibly) said that they as a nation had decided that guns were more important than children given that nothing changed after Sandy Hook.
 
Most Republicans would support legislation banning assault-style weapons, a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll found Wednesday — a finding that contradicts President Donald Trump's claim earlier the same day that there's "no political appetite" for such restrictions.

The poll found that nearly 70 percent of all voters would back such a ban. Support for an assault-weapons ban was higher, at 86 percent, among Democrats, who have been pushing for new restrictions on the firearms in the wake of two mass shootings over the weekend.


Maybe the UN should intervene, throw the entire system like a teabag in Boston, and make them start over again.
 
Hypothetical question: If someone went on a shooting spree with an assault rifle in the US senate, would the surviving senators be as eager to hand out "thoughts and prayers" while declaring it "the wrong time" to debate gun legislation afterwards?

Assuming this hypothetical killer is a white, Christian American, of course. If it's a foreign national or a person of different skin colour/faith, the discussion will take a whole different direction.
 
Back