Affordable health care then?
It's so predictable, isn't it. The shooting and the replies - it's an endless cycle. Like groundhog day, really.
It's so predictable, isn't it. The shooting and the replies - it's an endless cycle. Like groundhog day, really.
Don't they view all that as a restriction on them all getting tooled up? It's their constitutional right to pretend to be John Rambo.
In US schools they practice what to do in case of a mass shooting.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/10/04/opinion/thoughts-prayers-nra-funding-senators.html
More info
Corruption pure and simply.
Well yes they do but it is a matter of interpretation really. The 2nd ammendment specifies the right to bear arms (of no specific description ) but in the context of a regulated militia (which nobody is in). So it is open to widely different interpretations really and that is also to ignore the context of the time it was written, the arms that were available then versus now, the fact that there was no police force at the time, and it is an ammendment to begin with (i.e. a change from the original consitution).Don't they view all that as a restriction on them all getting tooled up? It's their constitutional right to pretend to be John Rambo.
I wish it was pure and simple. It's not, though.
If it was just a matter of an evil gun industry wanting to sell death and buy political influence, things would be simpler. It only took a generation to get big tobacco on the run.
The problem is that the gun lobbyists are pushing at an open door. And the door is open because Americans are really fudging odd. The gun fetish, the paranoia about government - you don't get either of those to anything like the same extent in any other civilised country.
Yeah, but they know all that, and don't do anything. It's a nonsense that something that is itself an amendment, a change, is considered sacrosanct and cannot be changed to move with the times, but they'll know that too, and still don't do anything. Anywhere else, the first load of dead kids would've been so mortifying that changes would've been a given, America - nothing.Well yes they do but it is a matter of interpretation really. The 2nd ammendment specifies the right to bear arms (of no specific description ) but in the context of a regulated militia (which nobody is in). So it is open to widely different interpretations really and that is also to ignore the context of the time it was written, the arms that were available then versus now, the fact that there was no police force at the time, and it is an ammendment to begin with (i.e. a change from the original consitution).
The point of this ammendment was obviously to allow the people a means to deal with an insurrection or a slave uprising, or overthrow an onerous government that was oppressing them and not for shooting each other when they got upset. A point ignored by those good old boys who love their guns.
The US government could fix or at least improve the situation if they wanted to but they don't. Money (edit: and Fox news!) decides american policy