• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Ange in or out?

Ange in or out?

  • In

    Votes: 86 69.4%
  • Out

    Votes: 38 30.6%

  • Total voters
    124
Reports suggest that he is being backed by the hierarchy, but I can't believe Levy's trigger finger isn't getting increasingly twitchy with each passing game.

Boards tend to back their managers right up to the moment that they don’t.

I’ve been saying for a week or so that the Liverpool semi first leg is a pivotal moment. If he loses that in a way that suggests we need a miracle in the second leg then he’s gone, I think.
 
gotta question ange and the coaches that he brought in

i have a feeling that ange and his assistants are not accustomed to the demands of the premier league, europe and the other cup competitions.

son, porro, udogie, maddison even dragusin all look knackered

only sarr and bentancur looked fresh and its because they've not been used often.

kulusevski is a freak of nature; levy should start a cloning division to harvest kulu's dna.
 
He will get to the end of the season IMO because we have nowhere to go now in the league, but he loses his job unless he has some kind of upward trajectory, I just don't see the board backing him in the summer based on losing as many as we win

we could drop like a stone from here, picking up 1 point from every 9 isn't going to cut it
 
He will get to the end of the season IMO because we have nowhere to go now in the league, but he loses his job unless he has some kind of upward trajectory, I just don't see the board backing him in the summer based on losing as many as we win
We've still got cups we could do something in.

Get rid now

We are also looking over our shoulders (we won't go down) Wolves / Palace / West Ham all improving
 
Boards tend to back their managers right up to the moment that they don’t.

I’ve been saying for a week or so that the Liverpool semi first leg is a pivotal moment. If he loses that in a way that suggests we need a miracle in the second leg then he’s gone, I think.
No single game should be a decider of whether someone should get the sack or not. He’s either on course to do as mandated, or he’s not. Of course, there will be a tipping point - but it won’t be “because we lost one game”.
 
They've better managed their home grown, club trained and locally trained quotas over the years. We have to register players like Whiteman, Austin, Gray, Lankshear etc in the Europa squad and even if we had went out and bought a couple of more "men" in the summer, they'd quite possibly not been able up be registered in the Europa League squad as a result of this issue.

When "just shut up and back the manager Levy" comes back to bite hard when we've had several seasons of short term managers in Mourinho and Conte that don't care about the club's future and don't want to work with kids.
You don't hire Mourinho or Conte if you have an integrated youth development program.

It should never shut up and back the manager. It should be pick the right type of coach that fits your club ethos and the plan going forward. Neither of the guys you mentioned matched Spurs in the first place.
 
You don't hire Mourinho or Conte if you have an integrated youth development program.

It should never shut up and back the manager. It should be pick the right type of coach that fits your club ethos and the plan going forward. Neither of the guys you mentioned matched Spurs in the first place.

If you count out CV’s like that because it doesn’t match your ethos, maybe that’s what needs rethinking.
 
Back