M
MartyFunkhouser
Guest
For me its the goalposts moving, used to be Net spend, now its % of turnover despite not allowing for fact ours is one of the largest in the game, not also taking into account debt ratio. Like most things in life there is a lack of balance when it comes to talking Spurs. We can all acknowledge Levy faults and positives, like we can say that some managers/players should have also walked through the door and won something given the platform they had. Amazon got the "all or nothing" part of the documentary spot on, but more about fan takes TBHWhat does make me laugh is the talk about wages
IMO we pay the right level for wages for the level of player we have
We can pay more but the player would need to warrant it
Why would we pay more wages for players who have actually achieved very little
The argument will be that you need to pay more to attract better players and that’s logical, but those players will also have other clubs offering them money and are likely to be clubs winning things (if the player is good enough). We can’t compete that way