LutonSpurs
Eric Dear
Its the LBC. It isn't the BBC. Why do you think the need to be impartial on the LBC?
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
American politics
- Thread starter Danishfurniturelover
- Start date
Its the LBC. It isn't the BBC. Why do you think the need to be impartial on the LBC?
LutonSpurs
Eric Dear
And it's really hard to be impartial about Trump being a racist cnut
Question Time is on the BBC.
Forsyth.
Rorschach
Mel Hopkins
She has none of that either
LutonSpurs
Eric Dear
And if he presented it he would have to be impartial. Nobody actually is in real life. People hold their own views.
Mikey10
Rafael Van Der Vaart
I regularly listen to The News Agents on which he is regularly entirely impartial and holds politicians from all parties to account.
Being impartial would be his role on QT. And I think he’d actually be on top of his brief, and able to chair a panel, unlike the present incumbent.
Yes but his political leanings are so well known by the audience it undermines the show. I would argue the same thing if someone like a Konstantin Kisin was given the role.
LutonSpurs
Eric Dear
Fiona Bruce is impartial lol. Do you watch it?
She’s more to the centre than Goodall.