• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

American politics

Whatever the current relationships the Gulf nations have with Iran, Qatar might the most friendly, none of them want a nuclear-armed Iran, nor do they want a protracted civil war if the Iranian regime were to fall. The arguments are that these strikes may be a win in the short term but in the medium term they are pushing Iran into one of these scenarios.
Trump knocked the first domino over by brick-canning the JCPOA because of his personal dislike of Obama. It was Trump trying to recreate a similar agreement with the Trump sticker on it that prompted Bibi to shoot his load over Iran at this time. And BiBi saw Trump was weak enough to do nothing to stop him, and he was right. This ceasefire or the next version of it won't hold IMO as it is not in Netanyahu's interest that it does.
 
Last edited:
Whatever the current relationships the Gulf nations have with Iran, Qatar might the most friendly, none of them want a nuclear-armed Iran, nor do they want a protracted civil war if the Iranian regime were to fall. The arguments are that these strikes may be a win in the short term but in the medium term they are pushing Iran into one of these scenarios.
Trump knocked the first domino over by brick-canning the JCPOA because of his personal dislike of Obama. It was Trump trying to recreate a similar agreement with the Trump sticker on it that prompted Bibi to shoot his load over Iran at this time. And BiBi saw Trump was weak enough to do nothing to stop him, and he was right. This ceasefire or the next version of it won't hold IMO as it is not in Netanyahu's interest that it does.
Exactly my point just made better. They are united against a common threat. The Islamic Banks in Dubai are known for holding ALOT of their cash too. I don't think they wanna be losing the kind of money being washed round the Gulf
 
The relationship with the UAE has soured for sure but in terms of the interests of the Gulf they have always had a mutual belief in protecting what's being built.

Saudi, Qatar, Bahrain and the UAE despite their wealth rely on peace for their very lives moving forward. Saudi have poured 800bn into tourism, given their power in the region alone, there is no way they allow this to persist long term again IMO and for the fact that they will all have that united view point, I suspect that wins through.

Thats just my opinion, I could be wrong

Qatar has always sat seperate from the others. They are not a united front as much as the idea in the west that they are united. Oman also differs largely from Saudi, UAE and Bahrain.

Qatar has no skin in Yemen or Sudan.

They have negotiated for the US with Taliban and Hamas. Something the others would not do.

There's genuine animosity on occasions to the point that the Saudi crown prince calling the Qatari Emir after the base attack was seen as significant news in the Gulf.
 
Qatar has always sat seperate from the others. They are not a united front as much as the idea in the west that they are united. Oman also differs largely from Saudi, UAE and Bahrain.

Qatar has no skin in Yemen or Sudan.

They have negotiated for the US with Taliban and Hamas. Something the others would not do.

There's genuine animosity on occasions to the point that the Saudi crown prince calling the Qatari Emir after the base attack was seen as significant news in the Gulf.
Of course, but there is a common problem here which IMO they would have a united agreement that escalation in Iran is massively hurtful to all of them.

That's the main point I'm trying to make, maybe badly hahaha
 
Back