• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

American politics

My favourite

super-callous.jpg
 
How many times has he gone bankrupt?

He is the worse sort of billionaire he did not run a company doing something that made the world a better place, he borrowed money from banks to build big buildings with dodgy deals on the side.

I often say one of the things that would stop a Trump getting in in this country is that he would be banned from running for public office because of his financial history.

He managed to lose money running a casino.

All the talk of being a property magnet is largely gonads. He sells his name to put on property that other people have put money up for.

This is one of the things that is worrying about the Russian links. Who does he owe money to there?
 
Muller is peeling an onion and this is only the 2nd layer. It is significant however as it is a direct charge against the Russian state rather than a third party.

It sounds like they've got Roger Stone and Assange with this too, both of those would be significant.
 
Yeh of course but alot of judgements are what ifs not what he has done. I will judge him after his term, so far his Boris JOhnson style is anything but dangerous
Hitler's term ended up being quite a long one, in hindsight appeasement perhaps wasn't the best strategy......a man who does the same thing twice and expects a different outcome.....
 
What truly bothers me are the people who actually believe him.

They believe him because that's what they want to believe. He could proclaim the earth flat and that the sun revolves around the moon and they'd lap it up because it tinkles off the goddamn liberals.
 
He'd resign and get a pardon before it got to that stage but if he can fix the supreme court he might not need to.
Can he pardon himself which, would be perverse, or is that what you mean by fixing the supreme court (i.e. they adjudicate on this possibility)?
 
Back