robp135
Sergei Rebrov
There is no reason to worry about low interest debt for a company that makes £500M+ a year.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
ENIC
- Thread starter mattls
- Start date
There is no reason to worry about low interest debt for a company that makes £500M+ a year.
ricky2tricky4city
Gary Stevens
It ain't low interest
ricky2tricky4city
Gary Stevens
We turnover £500m.
MartyFunkhouser
Tony Galvin
Yep same, I think it also puts all the pressure on this window being a 10/10 because you get down the line and say Savinho is a flop at near 100m, you are going to struggle to replace him, especially when you owe a chunk of revenue to repayments
robp135
Sergei Rebrov
What is the rate?
ricky2tricky4city
Gary Stevens
Reported 6-9s but even that was when base rates were much lower than they are now.
robp135
Sergei Rebrov
I am a Commercial Finance Broker. That is low for a working capital loan. Most business of Spurs size will be 10-15% at the moment. Man Utd were borrowing at 29% from the same type of loan from the same form a few years back.
ricky2tricky4city
Gary Stevens
As I say figures from lower base rate days
Is that since the Glazers?...clarify 29% from Macquarie?
Borrowing from the future is never a good idea. $40 trillion gov snowball your side of the pond innit?
robp135
Sergei Rebrov
As I say figures from lower base rate days
Is that since the Glazers?...clarify 29% from Macquarie?
Borrowing from the future is never a good idea. $40 trillion gov snowball your side of the pond innit?
Yeh it’s a disaster but I’d argue the US has greater capacity to sustain it than the UK even if the debt ratio is lower.