ShipOfTheseus
Ruel Fox
Shouldn’t Vega have moved on a bit by now? He could always open a fondue bar or run a weekly over-60s fitness class at his local gym, or something, instead of obsessing about Spurs.
Shouldn’t Vega have moved on a bit by now? He could always open a fondue bar or run a weekly over-60s fitness class at his local gym, or something, instead of obsessing about Spurs.
His roles at arsenal were mixed
Working somewhere doesn’t mean your good
Lange will leave here as the DOF that oversaw us winning a trophy
And he is awful
If Vinai had been to a few clubs and done clever things I’d maybe agree
Financial misuse is a serious claim
Makes zero sense. Removing Levy doesn't dilute his shares.
The grifters are part the issue, im 99.9% sure thay the Return of the Shelf is on the FAB board, so spends half his time trying to disrupt the club then the other trying to hold it to account. The noise and ridiculousness doesnt helpThe grifters are all out in force right now. I have to remind myself that our situation is a money making exercise to get clicks. It's all about making themselves relevant, and shouting the loudest to get the money flowing in. I'm hoping beyond hope the players can shut out the nose from now till the end of season
Shouldn’t Vega have moved on a bit by now? He could always open a fondue bar or run a weekly over-60s fitness class at his local gym, or something, instead of obsessing about Spurs.
Quite the attention seeker is our Ramon.
Hey I get thatI agree that working somewhere doesn’t automatically mean you’re good. However working somewhere long term, being promoted and stepping down of your own choosing several years later is probably more indication than not that you’ve done a decent job. Especially when you’re doing that at one the biggest organizations in your field in the world.
Shouldn’t Vega have moved on a bit by now? He could always open a fondue bar or run a weekly over-60s fitness class at his local gym, or something, instead of obsessing about Spurs.
Financial misuse is a serious claim
Yep, it’s complete and utter nonsense isn’t it, you’d have to be a complete macaron to believe that.Financial misuse is a serious claim
Enic are not going to take £300m from the football operations to build this if that's what you are suggesting. They were probably waiting for Haringey to get their ducks in a row (which for Haringey could take forever). Its something we should be proud of, and shows Levy was invested in the regeneration of the area. (We could have taken an easier route, and probably more profitable)I guess the issue is that ENIC will need to divert the £300m or whatever it will cost to build them upfront and soon. Its good there is now a guaranteed buyer, and i appreciate what you say that some of the loans will be offset. But its a significant distraction from rebuilding the football team.
So far.....we've had a zero net spend window.....given a player 200k a week, at least a third more than we needed to (or is worth).... bypassed signing anyone on loan when faced with a crisis....and borrowed £90m from future earnings.Be prepared to see more of these 'rumours' and 'leaks' as the Lewis Family comes under increasing scrutiny for their poorly timed and hubristic operation.
It remains unbelievable really, until the whole 'nepo factor' comes in. Even then, there are enough adults around surely, however wealth and power rarely employs challenge and accountability around it thus we have a bunch of mid-management sycophants.
So far.....we've had a zero net spend window.....given a player 200k a week, at least a third more than we needed to (or is worth).... bypassed signing anyone on loan when faced with a crisis....and borrowed £90m from future earnings.
And on that last point...Now read this from football finance expert Borsen....!!!
'Borsen points out that by borrowing the £90m figure, Tottenham Hotspur have contractually agreed that Macquarie would be owed around £100m from the club’s next broadcast revenue payment from the Premier League.
He explained that Spurs have simply borrowed against their future earnings, which are guaranteed, meaning there is very little risk for Macquarie'
Oops!
That loan was in SeptemberSo far.....we've had a zero net spend window.....given a player 200k a week, at least a third more than we needed to (or is worth).... bypassed signing anyone on loan when faced with a crisis....and borrowed £90m from future earnings.
And on that last point...Now read this from football finance expert Borsen....!!!
'Borsen points out that by borrowing the £90m figure, Tottenham Hotspur have contractually agreed that Macquarie would be owed around £100m from the club’s next broadcast revenue payment from the Premier League.
He explained that Spurs have simply borrowed against their future earnings, which are guaranteed, meaning there is very little risk for Macquarie'
Oops!
FFS Levy!So far.....we've had a zero net spend window.....given a player 200k a week, at least a third more than we needed to (or is worth).... bypassed signing anyone on loan when faced with a crisis....and borrowed £90m from future earnings.
And on that last point...Now read this from football finance expert Borsen....!!!
'Borsen points out that by borrowing the £90m figure, Tottenham Hotspur have contractually agreed that Macquarie would be owed around £100m from the club’s next broadcast revenue payment from the Premier League.
He explained that Spurs have simply borrowed against their future earnings, which are guaranteed, meaning there is very little risk for Macquarie'
Oops!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.