• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

You jumped on my views about religion, asked a question, I answered.

That simple
I jumped on your views or just entered a discussion. You said you were fed up of people holding up Christianity as the moral high ground and when i asked for the examples that are riling you up, you said Tommy Robinson. A guy that isn't worth your oxygen and is hardly "representative". Its a bit like saying "I'm fed up of Norwegians taking the eco warrior high ground" and then when asked WTF you are on about saying "Look at that f*cking Greta, who the f*ck does she think she is?"
 
It's ok for you to ask people if they are racist, are they right wing etc but when you're asked a question, you do everything you can to change the subject
Racists generally out themselves, no need to ask someone if they are a racist.

I've not seen anyone other than @LutonSpurs being asked their opinion on Sharia law. It's as if his being Muslim means he must support it unless he says otherwise. A huge assumption being made there, based solely on his race.
 
On sharia, I think we need to differentiate sharia as a concept from the idea that it should be enforced on non-muslims.

Sharia is a code that practising muslims must follow. Which really isn't much different to other religions. I guess the rigidity of the code (that it is referred to as "a law") is reflective of what i have said differentiates islam from (certainly) Christianity in the obligation for strict adherence to achieve the "end game" of admission to heaven.

Saying that, sharia is misunderstood and the existance of "sharia councils/courts" in the UK isn't in and of itself a threat. A practising muslim may come across a situation in their life where it is not clear whether an action would be halal (allowed) or haram (prohibited). A practising muslim may rely on a ruling of a sharia council or court on the matter and therefore be confident in their behaviour at "judgement day".
 
I am sorry this is total gonads. There are no passages (and i mean zero) in Christian stripture or the bible calling for violence against non-Christians or domination of Christianity.

In fact, Christian script states that your sins will only be forgiven if you forgive the sins of others. Violence is expressly frowned upon and will bring consequences on yourself "those that live by the sword shall die by the sword". Retaliation is expressly forbidden and you must "love thy enemy" and "love thy neigjbour" are noted express commandments by Jesus of his followers.
My favourite bit of the bible is how Adam's first wife Lilith was bumped off and replaced by Eve. And her big crime was that she liked a bit of cowgirl position, whereas GHod and adam felt that only missionary was submissive enough for womankind. Mad brick!
 
My favourite bit of the bible is how Adam's first wife Lilith was bumped off and replaced by Eve. And her big crime was that she liked a bit of cowgirl position, whereas GHod and adam felt that only missionary was submissive enough for womankind. Mad brick!
That doesn't happen in the bible. Lilith being Adam's first is a hebrew/jewish text occurrence.
 
Racists generally out themselves, no need to ask someone if they are a racist.

I've not seen anyone other than @LutonSpurs being asked their opinion on Sharia law. It's as if his being Muslim means he must support it unless he says otherwise. A huge assumption being made there, based solely on his race.
Since when is Islam a race? It’sa theology.

Luton has said that he’s not religious whatsoever … but won’t answer simple questions in a debate yet will accuse others as being bigoted and running away from a debate multiple times. You only have to scroll back to see his gymnastics to avoid answering questions himself.

Ultimately because it exposes him in having a view that is harsher than anything Tommy Robinson spouts on about or Nigel farage etc.

All Muslims that ultimately practice Islam are actually compelled to believe in sharia as it’s allahs words supposedly. He won’t condemn it because he can’t, and won’t have a leg to stand on in any conversation about equality and equal rights.

He said he’s not religious so there should be no issue for him right?

Yet he is happy ask debate and even call anyone who may share views with TR or NF as bigots/right wing/ racist. Can’t have it both ways.
 
Last edited:
Do you support or condemn Canon Law?
Condemn any law that compels anyone to kill or subjugate anyone else. Not in a story, not as an example not in anything. As far as I’m concerned the Sky GHod can surely do his own dirty work rather than his in the name of religion.
 
I jumped on your views or just entered a discussion. You said you were fed up of people holding up Christianity as the moral high ground and when i asked for the examples that are riling you up, you said Tommy Robinson. A guy that isn't worth your oxygen and is hardly "representative". Its a bit like saying "I'm fed up of Norwegians taking the eco warrior high ground" and then when asked WTF you are on about saying "Look at that f*cking Greta, who the f*ck does she think she is?"

Again though, you asked the question, I answered it. Really is as simple as that.

As for your little role playing example, thats not anywhere near what was said or happened, so good try, but you didn't stick the landing for me

2/10
 
Back