It's not a strawman argument - People say Frank's football has not been great, specific performances poor and all of a sudden posters are accused of having an over reaction or the flavour of the month phrase 'meltdown' as if posters want him gone. Everyone knows its early days and aren't being over critical of the manager, merely critiquing what is being played in front of our eyes.
He has had the same style of play his whole time in the PL that we have seen at his early days at Spurs, and most managers come in and implement their style from the start and go through that early period of pain. If an Ireola or someone similar had come here they wouldn't be going 'Lets focus on the defence first, then build from there', we would see his style of play from the beginning and it's fanciful to suggest it's just part of some longer term plan where we magically become more attacking under him.
That doesn't mean he can't or won't and like you say, with some more attacking ranks let's see what happens but I still think we have had enough players available to play better football if that's what was wanted by the manager. We all know it's early days so can't come to any real conclusions, they are merely observations and/or concerns at this stage....