Kind of agree with Neymar but also gaping holes. It is simply not true to state the global profile of athletics 'isn't that big'. It's probably second only to football! Also, I think one would be surprised just how well known Kelly Holmes and Edwards are outside of the UK. As for Edwards, his world record has not been bested for close to 20 years. I know this and remember the jump despite not being a big fan of Athletics. It is quite simply an incredible feat.
As for Steve Redgrave, yes I definitely agree re: financial clout required to be successful in his sport. But Zlatan's achievements in his sport are the equivalent of winning the St Johnstone Paint Trophy compared to Redgrave's achievements, akin to winning the quadruple 4 years in a row as comparison. The guy was a phenom, an ultimate Olympian.
i should probably clarify what i mean when i say that the global profile of athletics isnt that big. sports/competitions such as the premier league, la liga, nfl, nba etc have many fans who follow the sport on an almost daily basis. most people only follow athletics once every four years. or if someone is a big sports fan, they will watch the world and european championships too. beyond that, you will really struggle to get people to follow athletics.
as for a sport like rowing, there is genuinely only interest in it every 4 years for one month. outside of the uk, almost no-one has heard of redgrave or edwards. I dont deny that you remember Edwards because of his incredible world record feat, but the fact that he was an englishman acheiving this record was probably more important in him (and his jump) being memorable to you. if i was to ask you about other record breakers in athletics, beyond bolt, most would stuggle to name many non-british athletes.
also, people (globally) just arent interested enough in sports like triple jumping or rowing to reigster an athlete's name from these sports. we're (in england) only interested in rowing or cycling because we are good at it. if i was to ask you who Yuna Kim is, i suspect you wouldnt have a clue. And why should you. She has no connection to you or the uk. But her acheivements in figure staking are probably comparable to maradona/pele in football. she is massive in her native country, but unless you're a figure staking nut, you wouldnt have heard of her. this is the case with all those british athletes/sportsmen that were listed in the previous posts. hence my point that the global profile of these sports are miniscule when compared to football.
and for that reason, i would say zlatan's acheivements are more like winning 4 quadruples. whilst redgrave's would be the johnstones paint. having said that, i dont really like this analogy. zlatan has basically competed against every single boy in the world has trumped them all to get to where he is now. whilst redgrave has shown that he is the best sportsman from his eton college class. i don't like this analgoy either, but i hope it highlights just how much rarer and harder it is to get a zlatan than a redgrave. england is a country with deep sporting roots. yet in football, we often struggle against the very best in the world (despite having a massive football culture). however, in sports that not many other countries take part in, and have large barriers to entry, we seem to do very well. it doesnt take a genius to work out which sports are harder to reach the top in.
just to emphasise, redgrave's acheivments are exceptional, and something that all us brits can be proud of, but from a purely sporting perspective it just doesnt compare to zlatan's imo.
Strange argument, you guys have to clarify if you want to measure the actually sporting impact or global profile
If it's global profile, Beckham trumps Zlatan any day (and Borg), I know a lot of people who have no ****ing idea who Zlatan is, but know Beckham.
good point, but zlatan's global profile has been acheived mainly through his sporting performances whilst a large part of the "Beckham-mania" brand has been built off the pitch, by Victoria