fernadez
Dean Austin
L
I wasn't saying he was wrong, was just wondering what the qualifying criteria is. A week of good performances, 6 months, 11 months and 363 days?
Is the most recent 2 months of good form preceded by 10 months of brick better than 10 months of good and 2 of brick?
Other than
Lloris
Vertonghen
Eriksen
Kane
Who has excelled for a sustained period of time?
Wanyama in the last year hasn’t had one solid 90 minutes IMO
Could be because he was paired in CM with sissoko who hasn’t excelled in that role too but I’m not sure
GB has a point IMO about winks and Dier... watching them in the last few games (really small sample size) they have a balance between them and they look like they compliment each other better than any other pairing
The only other area of contention is does lamela start a fully fit team... on current form 400% but he hasn’t had this form long enough yet. It could be argued that out football has been toss for about a year but I wouldn’t say our football looks better with lamela but it can certainly be more effective
What I will say is we have some players who IMO are guaranteed to start regardless of formation and that’s Hugo, Verts, Eriksen and Kane
I wasn't saying he was wrong, was just wondering what the qualifying criteria is. A week of good performances, 6 months, 11 months and 363 days?
Is the most recent 2 months of good form preceded by 10 months of brick better than 10 months of good and 2 of brick?
Other than
Lloris
Vertonghen
Eriksen
Kane
Who has excelled for a sustained period of time?