jts1882
Dean Richards
I consider 'sport' to be something requiring physical exertion and a level of skill.
That would be my answer too, perhaps adding high levels of physical exertion and skill in a competitive situation.
So mountaineering or polar treks are not sport even though they involve physical exertion and skill. If it was a race, though, ...
Equestrian is a sport for horses, not humans. The horse is making most of the effort and demonstrating most of the skill. It doesn't matter how good the rider, a top horse is needed.
Same with motor racing. The driver is not the primary determinant of success. A top driver can't win without a top car, while a top car can win with a moderate driver.
Rowing, canoeing and cycling rely on the person for propulsion, which makes it a sport for me. The designs are tightly regulated and not allowed to diverge much so the strength and skill of the person is the primary determinant. Sailing uses the wind for propulsion, but it is totally down to the skill of the sailor to harness the energy and anyone watching the camera on Ainslie's boat wouldn't question the physical exertion. In contrast, motorboat racing depends on more on the motor and should not be considered a sport, although it has appeared in the Olympics.
Last edited: