FWIW, I'd stick with what we started with against Swansea. Sessegnon, McClean and Larsson are in good form, I'd like another DM in the mix to make things difficult for them. Then bring on Lennon's pace against tired legs to hit them on the counter in the second half.
Against Norwich at home, Lennon starts.
FWIW, I'd stick with what we started with against Swansea. Sessegnon, McClean and Larsson are in good form, I'd like another DM in the mix to make things difficult for them. Then bring on Lennon's pace against tired legs to hit them on the counter in the second half.
Against Norwich at home, Lennon starts.
First good game in a while for VdV. So a little early to talk about his best position.
We were not ahead with the 2 DM on the middle, just as we weren't against Bolton. We really should be beating Swansea at home, quitev easily. We do not have a good record at all playing with 2 DM.
I disagree, I think his best position is just off the striker - and when Lennon is back in the team there is absolutely no point in playing Rafa on the right wing.
For the reasons I mentioned before. When he plays behind the striker he often drops too deep and leaves the striker isolated all on his own. It's ok if you drop deep and you're fast enough to sprint back up when your striker is holding up the ball, but Rafa isn't.
When he plays out wide, as a wing forward not a winger, the role requires a player who roams around a bit more often, which suits him nicely. It allows him to cut in on his left foot and to get shots and crosses in on goal, as well as picking out the runs of Bale and Ade. Lennon is your traditional pacey winger, but lots of the best 4-3-3s have had a slower, more technical wing-forward on the opposite side to his natural foot. Think Joe Cole at Mourinho's Chelsea, or Mata now,
Rest no one.
Strongest team possible for Sunderland, then ditto for Norwich.
VdV best position is centrally behind the main striker not out on the right. His goal scoring tally in the two position illustrates this.
Strangely Cole and Mata are both number 10s that have been stuck out wide because they didn't fit into a formation.
The best wide players in 433 are quick players ala barcelona not converted number 10s.
Rafa's always been a #10. Playing him on the wing is foolish. Centre of the 3 in a 4-2-3-1, or right of the 2 in a 4-3-2-1 should be his only positions.
And he's almost always top of our ground covered stat, even when he's played 75 minutes compared to others' 90.
Thought he played well against Chelsea and Bolton too. In the RWF role.
We went 1-0 up with two DMs, and we were all over them in the first half using this formation. I thought their goal came against the run of play personally. We also played this formation at Stamford Bridge and shat all over them, if we'd scored some of the sitters that came our way (missing them was nothing to do with the formation) then we'd have thrashed them.
Away from home against Sunderland is a different kettle of fish to a home game.
He is not being played "on the wing". He is being played wide, but drifting all over the place, doing what he does. His goals and overall contribution points towards playing him on the right being quite good.
What is the difference between the position role he had against Swansea and "on the right of the 2 in a 4-3-2-1"?