I acknowledge the argument that people do stupid things in the heat of the moment, but that should have little bearing on how that incident is punished. With Suarez's history and considering what he did I think 10 games is not totally unfair, even if he isn't actually a prick off the field and is just susceptible to seeing red. Although it has to be said I think the ban would have been shorter for most other players.
I just find it funny that Defoe got nothing because he was booked for the challenge in which he bit someone. The FA's rules are ridiculous. Referees are human and as such are fallible, to have rules preserving their total control over proceedings when technology has developed enough to provide more accuracy is ludicrous, especially in a business where their fallibility can cost tens of millions. In the case of Defoe it was the difference between a booking and at least a 5 game ban...
Take it out the fa hands, simply just don't bite any one
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Fapatalk 2