It would be similar if people suggest these guys BECAUSE they managed a few wins over Wigan and Bolton.
However, if someone suggests these guys (or anyone else) because they believe in their management ability and potential then you do them a disservice
Phil Brown (born 30 May 1959) managed memorable
away wins over Arsenal, Tottenham and Saudi Sportswashing Machine duiring his first PL season. In addition they held Emirates Marketing Project, Liverpool and Chelsea to a draw at Anfield and Stamford Bridge respectively.
He also had amassed 33 points at this point in the season compared to Swansea's 39.
Up to now Rogers' stand out results are
home wins against Arsenal and Emirates Marketing Project - the rest are wins against bottom half cloggers and imploding teams in freefall. Nothing spectacular of note.
Part of their perceived success is the fact they've most likely approached this season with no pressure or expectations whatsoever (much like most PL debutants would do naturally) and the manager most likely tells them to go out and enjoy themselves. Pumped from the adrenalin of competing the world's richest league they have nothing to lose and come out flying. Happens every year. Happens in many leagues. Happens on many levels. But then the second season comes when the true grit is tested.
However - be that as it may - these are not the objectives at a club of our scale and aspirations - regular CL participants and on a reasonable level/time lapse - title contenders. The pressure of delivering results for a club of our stature is quite different to telling overachieving average-to-brick players to go out, have some fun and enjoy the run. Thier first 4 PL games yielded a grand total of 2 points including a crushing defeat at City. The fans would be on his back demanding blood if he started off our season on a similar note and that is a fact. Can he cope with the pressure of a big club?
You keep on banging how Rogers (if indeed chosen) should be given time to build and carry out his plan, vision and managing ideas then the following sentence knock down AVB for attempting the exact same thing at probably the 2nd, most difficult managerial job in the world. Righto. SAF was battling for years before the cogs kicked in, not sacked after 2 successive defeats and a draw. And that is exactly a reflection of society's complete and total degratation to a sub-primate level of demanding instant success and gratification. I want it 'now'! I want to shag now! I want to be rich now! I want my low self-esteem comforting junk-food now! I want my club to win the CL now! So unless he won the treble with Chelsea this season he'd be deemed a trenchcoat overhyped clown? Are these the parameters of success? Is Ancelotti a failure? It is all contextual
AVB's Porto played much more attractive and attacking football last season than the mighty Swansea do at the moment, crushed teams both in Portugal and Europe while players smashed UEFA's goal-scoring records with a bang. And no - it is not the equivalent of winning the SPL as much you'd try and convince yourself it is, while at the same time ignoring his considerable Europa League success.
To conclude - your main points of argument for Rogers are in direct contradiction to exactly what AVB has done and subsequently attempted to do at Chelsea. Meaning - if you are prepared to give some random football 'nobody' (who's been living off those Mourinho quotes for years now) a chance to carry out his project - then by the same logic it makes no sense whatsoever to deny someone like AVB (for example) the opportunity of doing the same. I don't care if either come but a level playing field should be given to all prospective managers