Hey Steff, my point is, and
@Benny_Lad kind goes there as well
- Dele has/had a high ceiling, but he hasn't hit that point in a long time and is now in the "maybe if we give him game time and a formation that suits him, he will get back there"
- When he is likely to get game time (lesser games), he struggles to make an impact, my point (which has now digressed to a Dele vs. Lamela argument) is Lucas & Lamela in the same situation will have more of an impact in those "lesser" games (and data backs that up, Lamela actually has more cup goals for Spurs than Dele)
- If he can't impact those games, then how would a manger be expected to play him in a higher level game? hence the circle continues -> poor performance -> not enough game time
I think this is the usual you and me conversation
- The dreamer would say there is a WC talent there, we should do everything we can to get him back there even at a short term cost to team
- The pragmatist would say, just another young English talent that didn't push on, isn't justifying his inclusion and we should cash in before it's a total loss.
My other issue with Dele is who does he replace in the side? nobody wants to answer this, it's either 5 or 6 spots -> PEH, Skipp, Ndombele, Lo Celso, Lucas, Bergwijn, Son, Kane. I'd say 4 of those spots are locked (PEH, Son, Kane +either Lo Celso/Ndombele), Skipp likely in if we want more solidity, other of Lo Celso/Ndombele if we want more attacking/creative, Bergwijn for width, Lucas for width and/or directness. In the first 11 I just don't see game time in any real way, add in his poorer lesser game impact, it's hard for him.
And while it's seemingly the fashion now to brick on Lamela (flimflam about he can't pass or beat a man), if we had one game to play tomorrow that was critical and the choice was between the two of them, I know who I would pick and I know who would turn up and give a brick.