FolkestoneSpur
Neil Sullivan
You're not wellDid you shag him or at least tug him off ?
You're not wellDid you shag him or at least tug him off ?
There is nothing about xG that I don't find odd.
The quality was so poorNot worst. Actually very entertaining. Could have ended 6-6. I think I heard the commentators say Leeds had 20 attempts. It was end to end. Neither team could defend effectively. How we came away with a clean sheet will remain one of the mysteries of the season.
I always find xG to be on the stingy side. With the good chances created 4-8 could quite easily have been the scoreline, but xG says 2-2.
I always find xG to be on the stingy side. With the good chances created 4-8 could quite easily have been the scoreline, but xG says 2-2.
It's pure statistics. If players tend to miss chances from that area the XG will be lower than you might expect. It's a bit like a discussion I had on here earlier this week with the half volley chance Moura had against Burnley. Some though it was a good chance but in reality a half volley is a very very low percentage chance. XG statistically reflects that.I always find xG to be on the stingy side. With the good chances created 4-8 could quite easily have been the scoreline, but xG says 2-2.
Could have been 12-6 in the endUnder 6 hours till kick off and no thread
No wonder conte is fed up, cretins
No idea on the team today
As long as Royal & Sessegnon aren't starting I'll be happy
Leeds absolutely awful for weeks will turn up and play the game of their lives today but our counter attacking will put them to the sword
Leeds 2 Tottenham 5
View attachment 13714
Disagree with both comments because as usual posters on this site struggle with context and have tunnel vision.
Our squad when it has just a few injuries cannot cope with constant games every few days.
The centre backs never change so they will tire. The wingbacks and central midfield are good enough to be rotated but we have injuries in those positions, so again no rotation. Kane has to play every game so again no rotation.
But hey its all fine just keep sending them out every few days, nothing to worry about!
Could have been 12-6 in the end
Was a great watch
The quality was so poor
Pub standards at times
Genuine question: Does XG factor in the quality of the player presented with a scoring chance?
With some of the insane chances we had, I find it odd that we barely got over 2 in xg.
Some of the defending - by both sides- was Mickey Mouse at times, but it made for great entertainment
Genuine question: Does XG factor in the quality of the player presented with a scoring chance?
No. It averages chance completion from specific positions. Someone like Kane usually out performs XG. It can be a useful tool to determine how clinical a player is.Genuine question: Does XG factor in the quality of the player presented with a scoring chance?
YepSome of the defending - by both sides- was Mickey Mouse at times, but it made for great entertainment
A bit early but I do hope he varies his shooting pattern. Then again Townsend hasn't changed his and he does score a few.How about that Kulusevski fellow, eh? brick. I was skeptical, but goes to show how much I know. He looks a proper signing, doesn't he? Strong on the ball, he's got drive and skill, and a bullet of a shot. Love him already.
NoGenuine question: Does XG factor in the quality of the player presented with a scoring chance?