I fully understand why he didn't start but what type of man management is it when a manager continuously gives an established player 5 minutes to show what he can do? even when he does well in the cameo appearances he still can't find it in himself to give him more minutes. Let him play somewhere else if all you're going to do (regardless of result, performance etc etc) is give him 5-10 mins.
Sigurdsson has been worse than Dempsey. Holtby showed on the pitch today why it was the right decision to bring him on instead of Sig.
I don't see how Sigurdsson has any complaints. He was given playing time from the bench even when not really performing, based on some good performances there he got the start against Leeds and wasn't good enough.
Would be much more unfair to not play players that actually have been performing like Lennon, Dempsey, Bale or Dembele.
Hopefully Sigurdsson doesn't share your attitude, if he does I would actually be worried about his future at the club. I think he's very much aware that he hasn't been good enough this season, the frustration you could see when he was taken off against Leeds didn't look directed at AVB. If he's a professional and keeps working hard and keeps trying he will get his chances. If he thinks it's the managers fault that he's not performing well enough then there might actually be a problem. I don't think that's the case though.
Funny thing is that we were all slagging him off and he wasn't on the best form but how much are we missing Ade? As a foil for our other attackers to work off he is vital in bullying and disorganising defences with his physical presence and build-up play. Last few games without him have seen a lot of possession without the killer chances and I think without another centre forward in the squad (defoe is just a finisher really) we lack a focal point to our attacks. Come back soon Ade or Levy sign a back-up!
"He was given time off the bench even when not performing"
Wow that makes no sense at all..absolutely no sense whatsoever. He was given time of the bench (5- 10 minutes every game btw) because either things wasn't going our way OR AVB was seeing a game out so put him on to kill time. That sentence would make more sense if he was given 30 minutes or so..then yes you could say that but he's given 5 minutes and you come out with that? wow.
Nobody was good enough vs Leeds...not 1 player was good enough. If you can't see that giving a player 5 minutes for 5 or 6 games in a row will not do anything positive for the players morale then that's up to you (as well as the manager changing formations rather then pick you AND picks a player the just signed the day before).
"He was given time off the bench even when not performing"
Wow that makes no sense at all..absolutely no sense whatsoever. He was given time of the bench (5- 10 minutes every game btw) because either things wasn't going our way OR AVB was seeing a game out so put him on to kill time. That sentence would make more sense if he was given 30 minutes or so..then yes you could say that but he's given 5 minutes and you come out with that? wow.
Nobody was good enough vs Leeds...not 1 player was good enough. If you can't see that giving a player 5 minutes for 5 or 6 games in a row will not do anything positive for the players morale then that's up to you (as well as the manager changing formations rather then pick you AND picks a player the just signed the day before).
"He was given time off the bench even when not performing"
Wow that makes no sense at all..absolutely no sense whatsoever. He was given time of the bench (5- 10 minutes every game btw) because either things wasn't going our way OR AVB was seeing a game out so put him on to kill time. That sentence would make more sense if he was given 30 minutes or so..then yes you could say that but he's given 5 minutes and you come out with that? wow.
Nobody was good enough vs Leeds...not 1 player was good enough. If you can't see that giving a player 5 minutes for 5 or 6 games in a row will not do anything positive for the players morale then that's up to you (as well as the manager changing formations rather then pick you AND picks a player the just signed the day before).
Have to agree with the Brain I'm afraid mate. Sig was given plenty of chances in the first half of the season and simply wasn't good enough. I know Dempsey hasn't been that much better, but at least he's scored a few goals. Sig's set pieces haven't even been good either.
I don't think he should be starting BUT when you give a player a few 5 minute cameos and he gets 3 assists and plays well the normal thing is to then maybe give him 15 minutes..and then maybe 25 minutes..and then maybe more..until 1 of our starters dips in form and he starts. It's like AVB has an alarm set on his watch that reminds him to put Sig on regardless of result or how we're playing. When it's 85 minutes on comes Sig which shows AVB is not even putting him on based on what Sig could do to change the game etc etc..it clearly seems like he's just taking a punt.
I don't think he should be starting BUT when you give a player a few 5 minute cameos and he gets 3 assists and plays well the normal thing is to then maybe give him 15 minutes..and then maybe 25 minutes..and then maybe more..until 1 of our starters dips in form and he starts. It's like AVB has an alarm set on his watch that reminds him to put Sig on regardless of result or how we're playing. When it's 85 minutes on comes Sig which shows AVB is not even putting him on based on what Sig could do to change the game etc etc..it clearly seems like he's just taking a punt and shows he has no real faith in him.
Is it not possible that AVB just rates Dempsey and Lennon higher at the moment and has only been bringing on Sig when one of them has been running out of steam? Just doing what is best for the team.
Like I said, I really hope (and think) Sig has a different attitude towards this than you do.
and on a counter attack.One positive - We got another late ish goal