Legohamster
Ian Walker
Jose parking the bus at home - I guess it's acceptable now...
It seems the only team it's not an acceptable tactic for is Arsenal and Spurs.
wenger won't and spurs fans won't allow it.
Jose parking the bus at home - I guess it's acceptable now...
Agree with that, but as I said in an earlier post, we need to get more cynical and clinical. We showed some vs Everton, but it's still something we lack most of the time.On the whole, positive for me as I can see some plan and a bit of shape.
its nice having a hungry young team out there that we can move forwards with rather than wasters like ade, kaboul and capoue, who are either shiit now, always been shiit or are on the way down to shiitness.
id much rather watch these guys giving it a go. these players and performances i can get behind and have faith we can develop.
We lacked cutting edge but my word are we staring to look a decent side with the team that started - we lack a couple of players but I am actually happy with a lot of that game funnily enough
This; though when following bits on the radio on and off, it did feel like Chelski were just chilling waiting for us to run out of puff or slacken and give away a chance....
The studio pundits really annoyed me yesterday (as usual really). We were just some minor obstacle for Chelsea to overcome on their way to the title. Same with Sunderland against City. It's not presented as a game between two teams, but simply as Chelsea TV.
Exactly. It amuses me that some fans use the fact that Chelsea were happy to take a breather and let us have the ball and play non threatening sideway passes to each other on the half way line as some kind of "positive" we can take from the game.
The truth is Chelsea did not break a sweat.
Disagree with your statement about us being in control. We had the ball but rarely did they look stretched or out of second gear. We looked tidy but blunt and created very little
It was for me a winnable game off the back of a great performance at the weekend but we concede defeat by playing a weakened team (not our best a viable which was the side that win against Everton)
We massively contributed to our downfall though with poor defensive errors and that has to stop (can't blame Poch directly for that) but why away at Chelsea play Lamella???? Yes he played some nice passes and did out Kane in once although he was offside but if your gonna change it then play a defence minded player rather than a player who is busy but impacts the game so little either way.
Very frustrating
They certainly broke a sweat early on in the first half.
Of course after going two goals up Chelsea will sit back and be ridiculously difficult to break down. This is Mourinho and this is arguably the best Chelsea team he's ever put together. We made them work reasonably hard though and if at any point we'd gotten the 2-1 goal I think it would have gotten very interesting.
The game was winnable in the same way that any game is winnable. This was the toughest game of the season and Chelsea have lost once (I think?) ever under Mourinho at home in the league. It might have been winnable, but it was always a long shot.
To win it we would have needed marginal stuff to go our way. The team Poch sent out at least got us into the right situations to do that. Had we scored early on the game would have changed drastically in character and we surely created chances. Once those marginal situations didn't go our way we needed to weather the storm a bit when Chelsea attacked. It wasn't like they carved us open repeatedly, they were rather clinical and scored with 2 of their first 3 shots on target iirc. At that point it was always going to be very difficult. But I don't think that takes away from the performance. And there's just no way of knowing if playing your team would have meant a better performance or a higher likelihood of winning.
On one hand it's not the end of the world losing against this Chelski side. On the other hand it's another case of the usual 'ifs, buts and maybes' that we as Spurs fans are adept at handing out.
I still don't get why we paid Arsenal far more respect than we did Chelski. Sitting deep and having two banks of 4 would have made us much more solid imo. We may still have lost in the end, but losing 1-0 and keeping some semblance of dignity to the scoreline would surely have been better for team and club morale imo
I would rather see Poch go out to try to get the result. Whatever the reasoning we were really good in that first period of the game, it worked (if you're capable and allowed to look at a performance and not just the goals scored).
Hopefully when reviewing the game Poch and the coaches spends some time focusing on the period of the game where Bentaleb, Mason, Lennon, Lamela, Eriksen and Kane with an average age of what 22-23 years old outplayed Chelsea and created chances. That's what they're capable of. That's their best level. Now just do that a bit more often. I think that feeling could do a lot for our confidence.
How is one supposed to talk about a performance rather than just the result without using ifs buts and maybes? I honestly don't think my post was making excuses, I don't think I was unduly biased towards us. I might have to watch that opening 20 minutes again with a bit less stress, but i really think we did well. I know we had the better chances up until Hazard's goal. What should we do? Just discuss the scoreline and the goals? The performance doesn't matter?
I would rather see Poch go out to try to get the result. Whatever the reasoning we were really good in that first period of the game, it worked (if you're capable and allowed to look at a performance and not just the goals scored).
Hopefully when reviewing the game Poch and the coaches spends some time focusing on the period of the game where Bentaleb, Mason, Lennon, Lamela, Eriksen and Kane with an average age of what 22-23 years old outplayed Chelsea and created chances. That's what they're capable of. That's their best level. Now just do that a bit more often. I think that feeling could do a lot for our confidence.
It's good to look at positives, but to get the best long term out of the team you also have to look at the negatives. It's no disgrace to lose to Chelski, but why not go out and get the result in the same manner we also tried to get the result away at Arsenal? We frustrated Arsenal before starting to turn the screw and it nearly worked in getting us all three points. In the end it partially worked in that we got a very creditable draw. We played from a very solid base, whist yesterday we seemed to fire ourselves out of the blocks and attack them from the get go. And Chelski are a FAR better team. Why not be similarly cautious against them?
Yes, we were a whisker from taking the lead, but against a Jose team you have to play the long game and I don't think we did at all. It we played similarly to Arsenal but still lost say 1-0 or 2-0 late on, I don't think things would feel so bad.
Remember that these were young players whose confidence of knowing that they 'went toe-to-toe with Chelski for 20mins' could easily be shattered by a final scoreline that actually says 'yeah, yeah, play around all you like but in the end you're nowhere near touching us'
However, if we beat Palace AND play well, them all will feel better again...however if we don't (and that's NOT inconceivable) then this result will feel all the worse imo
There were a lot of positives yesterday. But we really do have to stop making silly mistakes. We have been saying this for years and years. There's something about that ground. Lloris has been imperious this season but even he succumbed to the hoodoo. We just honestly have got to cut it out. Its a mentality thing. We are always on the verge of a silly mistake. It plays on the players' minds. Chelsea mistakes are so few and far between that they just don't believe they will make any anymore.
I think our youngsters are a bit tougher than you seem to think.
Remember Mason started his first league game away to Arsenal and didn't look out of place. Remember Bentaleb being thrown in a the deep end last season and looking like he'd been playing PL football for years, at 19, in central midfield. I don't think their confidence is shattered by a loss away to Chelsea. They'll get the ball against Palace and just keep doing their thing.
The thing is that those silly mistakes get punished a lot more against Chelsea. Lloris has one weakness, it's his kicking/distribution. Not some complete shock that it ended up costing us. Not a big shock that it's the best team in the league that ended up punishing that weakness. It's what they do.
That's a fair point; I guess the proof will be in the pudding vs Palace...we'll see...
Kane admits they were taught a hard lesson but wants Spurs to bounce back against Crystal Palace on Saturday.
“We started very well, we created a few chances and hit the bar with a header,” he said. “On another day it could have dropped in.
“We created a couple of others, too. They didn’t go in, either, and Chelsea punished us for it. They’re a good side and it’s something we have to learn from. They were just more ruthless than us.
“But we have to dust ourselves down because we have a big game coming up at the weekend.
“Obviously we are disappointed but we can’t dwell on it too much. There are too many important games coming up that we have to win, starting this weekend. We have to keep up the intensity in games and do well.
“Everton [the 2-1 home win last Sunday] was the benchmark of how we have to play this season and hopefully we can go beyond that and keep improving.”
Midfielder Nabil Bentaleb also feels it is vital they restore their spirits and make up for the defeat against Palace.
“We have to keep our heads up, go back to the training ground and work hard because we have another game to prepare for on Saturday,” he said. “Now it’s all about Palace. We won’t have any problems (against them) if we play like we did against Everton.”