What on earth would the CPO have to do with any NFL deal?
It's a load of old bull isn't it?
Twickenham definitely has a limit on the number of events in can stage each year and the RFU would never sanction an association football club playing there. Besides, the public transport links to Twickenham are even worse than to Tottenham.
I imagine the F.A. might have something to say about the goal posts as well Milo.
My sister lives over that way so I could pop in for some tea and cake, Twickenham it is then.
In all seriousness it sounds like Wembley or MK DONS. Neither is the end of the world for a season.[/QUOTE]
Agree, if, we have to share, I could live with either of those two options, with MK my selfish first choice
I ask anyone on here.. if you were told the clubs being spoke about would you forget them.
A wildcard choice should it be finished is...
http://www.brentfordfc.co.uk/news/article/lionel-road-secretary-of-state-approval-1419585.aspx
I don't think that matters tbh. A lot won't want to do it IMO.. infact for that season they should forget season tickets, miss a year.
I think it matters massively. The last thing the club will want to do is allow the number of ST holders to drop and risk those people not then buying one the next season when the whole economic model will depend upon 40 odd thousand season tickets being sold. In fact it wouldn't surprise me to see the club look to sell a few thousand more season tickets in the one or two years before we play in the new stadium.
I think any stadium we play at for a season will definitely have a capacity of over 30,000.
I don't think that matters tbh. A lot won't want to do it IMO.. infact for that season they should forget season tickets, miss a year.
This would allow us to maybe have 1-2 games at 90k like Arsenal.
It's not called the Carling cup any more.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.