Some idiot called Akhilleus was moaning on the SSC thread, and I wanted to post/discuss it here as I've heard others mention it.
He said: Every time I look at the new stadium design, I can't help but feel a twinge of... almost anger mixed with sadness at the fact that we won't have the intimate stands so close to the touchline anymore that are, dare I say, unique in world football? That is WHL's identity, the thing that sets it apart from all other stadia. I'm massively disappointed that more effort wasn't put into trying to get the stands as close to the touchline in NWHL as they are now at WHL. Levy says we have the closest stands of any modern stadium in Europe? Lies. Only the South stand, and it will still be further away than Park Lane is. Bilbao's stadium is tighter on three of the four sides. I'm sure the design could have been tweaked.
Someone replied:
Fifa & Uefa lay down separate but similar guidelines for new stadia build and stadiums are then given a category , A, B, C and so on. Allocation for club finals/semi finals etc and for international matched including semis and finals, e.g. euros and world cups depend on the stadium category. If we kept the NWHL dimensions we would have been allocated a lowly category and so couldn't be allocated any of those. As is, with the South stand distance breaking one of these guidelines we won't be allocated a World Cup final, but all others are up for grabs but once again with Wembley we probably would get a Euro Nations final. All distances from stand to the pitch are the minimum requirement as per UEFA/FIFA with the exception of the new South stand which is half the distance. But note, the first 3 rows there lift up to slid the pitch under the stand, so perhaps they are detatchable too, increasing the distance to match UEFA/FIFA requirements for finals too - last bit is speculation on my part though.
Note - the stands are as close to the pitch as possible. Indeed the south stand is closer than it should really be. Also, if you move the stands closer then you lose some seats unless you make the stands less steep so to get 61k seats some fans would end up just as far away or further away anyway. The design is OPTIMAL. Note also if you have the stands TOO close then players running at full pelt (e.g. Rose and Walker) run into the advertising screens and injure themselves / fall into the crowd and hurt themselves, like the guy at Everton last week who slid into a solid concrete wall (!!) where they have a gap in the advertising and cracked his head open.