I take it there's no chance of Haringey turning down the revision? Not after the amount of time it's taken already and the benefits that Haringey should get from it?
Talking of 'fudge', I was watching one of those programmes about dodgy tattoos. One guy had a poorly drawn J so it said "Only G.od can Fudge me"Tottenham motherfudgeing Hotspur
I take it there's no chance of Haringey turning down the revision? Not after the amount of time it's taken already and the benefits that Haringey should get from it?
No doubt with English heritage, absolute fudgers. The historic buildings on the high Road never offered any aesthetic value. The one that's retained is the best and should hopefully get us over the line.English heritage and the transport studies will still fight it
Airflow apparently.The one thing I'm not keen on is the wavy bit at the top of the Kop. I wish they'd've filled in the corners to the top properly. It's just a lingering nod to the crap stadiums of the 00s.
Can you imagine the first ever game in that stadium and the buzz you will get?
It's definitely time to move onwards and upwards and whilst White Hart Lane will be the home of Spurs we are moving literally yards and angles not miles down the road. I'll still call it the lane anyway and I'm sure others will.
I think Arsenal can expand their stadium to 70,000 seats just by filling in the gaps they've left around and reducing the size of their seats to about the same size as the ones at Old Trafford.
I wonder if we've gone with future proofing like that.
Liverpool have "the Kop".The 'Kop' name was too synonymous with 'pool and Id agreed with others that we should have a distinctive name for Spurs wall of fans. But it seems its a term not associated with one club. Ironically the first reference to a kop was at a certain scummy south London club located in Woolwhich.