Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
51k is a decent attendance, especially as Hudderfield are a small club who only average 5,000 for their home games.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand
- Thread starter Jordinho
- Start date
51k is a decent attendance, especially as Hudderfield are a small club who only average 5,000 for their home games.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Part of it will also be diminishing returns - the first deal will be the biggest one, then subsequent ones will be smaller as the names all blur into one (like no one has any idea who now sponsors the Milk/Littlewoods Cup).
It's never going to be that big a deal anyway. Even the biggest ever stadium sponsorship would be about 1/4 of what our shirt sponsorship deal is worth, so it's pretty small fry really.
Ethiad sponsorship deal is worth ~£40m a year. Glad you think it's small fry...
ricky2tricky4city
Steffen Freund
A quarter? ...so £10m ...I think the yearly amount will be quite a bit more than that.
Modric THFC
Jimmy McCormick
My feeling is the naming rights will go to however the new owners are. Buy the club, stick their brand's name on the stadium.
Then why are we paying that guy to find us a naming rights deal?
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
That's not a sponsorship deal. That's FFP avoidance - they are sponsoring themselves to generate expenditure headroom.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
About £15m is the market rate at the moment, excluding the City type fiddle.
ricky2tricky4city
Steffen Freund
New owners are a long way off. Long enough to not be foregoing naming rights money.
ricky2tricky4city
Steffen Freund
Levy will want 20+, and I think he has a good case for that.
Especially if we get the superbowl in 2026.
Barca's one for Camp Nou is bigger than Citys one, and there's others in the US that are £20m+ a year.
It's the only stadium in the world that will have regular Premier League and NFL games. We're rightly going to be looking at the
upper end of the current deals that are out there.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
But our AIA shirt deal was £320m. So still relatively small.
£320m for 8 years, £40m per year, so no, not relatively small.
superspurs
Justin Edinburgh
As cool as that would be, it's never happening in a million years.
The nfl is declining, they are pushing for more global appeal. Hence games at spurs, talks of franchises outside the us. Having a superbowl outside the us would gain publicity for the sport. It may be unlikely but i wouldn't rule it out.
Think it would be more likely to be held in Canada or even Mexico before it's held in Europe.
superspurs
Justin Edinburgh
Possibly, the biggest threat to the NFL and what will accelerate any decline is still CTE, I don't think just changing the market to get money out of other folk is going to make a big difference in the long run.
Unless the fabled London based team comes along it won't happen either, I don't think our stadium even meets the requirements for a SuperBowl host stadium at the moment unless they change the criteria, Wembley on the other hand is much more suited.
Wembley isn't suited at all. They don't have the changing rooms for the 40 man squads, cheerleaders etc... The players stand by the side of the pitch so you have to close of the front rows of the crowd so they can see over them.