...is because we played it this season.
I have been very vocal in my criticism of our involvement in this competition, and I'm sad to say that it appears to have cost us once again.
Going for the Europa League is the ultimate risk taking strategy. You don't get any "cred" for reaching the quarter-finals. Do you respect Saudi Sportswashing Machine any more for reaching the quarter-finals? No, they had a terrible season. Nobody remembers anything about the campaign from outside the club unless you reach the final, and reaching the final is tricky. Anything can happen along the way. You can concede a sloppy away goal. A player can get sent off at a crucial point of the match. A player can choke in a penalty shoot-out. Even if you are one of the better sides in the competition, the odds are stacked against you, especially when the CL drop-outs come. We all know the stats. You get less prize money for winning the Europa League than you do for simply reaching the CL group stages. Top players would rather join a club that offers them CL football, rather than a chance to walk past the Europa League in a trophy cabinet on their way into the stadium. And we had a great chance of being able to offer them just that. Except...we tried to focus on the Europa League.
So our first team played 12 extra games. Two of them going to extra time. One of them we had to play all of extra time with 10 men. You think that didn't wear the team down? If we'd managed just two more points we'd have CL football this season. If we'd used the EL group stage games to give first team experiences to the likes of Townsend, Carroll, Naughton, Coulibally etc, then not only would they have developed their own games more, but our first teamers would have been fresher. I have no doubt that those 12 extra games could have been 2 more league points if only we'd rested them.
Want some proof? We were 7 points clear of Arsenal at the start of March. They then went out of Europe. We all know what happened, they focused on the league and won 8 and drew 2 of their next 10 games. Whereas we stayed in Europe, and here's what happened:
Spurs 3-0 Inter
Liverpool 3-2 Spurs - a game we threw away in the second half
Inter 4-1 Spurs - After extra-time
Spurs 0-1 Fulham - After a tired, weary performance
Spurs 2-2 Basel - with Bale getting injured
Spurs 2-2 Everton
If we'd won any of those three games, we'd be in the CL now. But we arrogantly tried to compete on two fronts when we don't have the squad for it.
Now before somebody says "But it'll be the same if we get CL football, we have to play the same players". There's a key difference. The big clubs in the CL have bigger budgets from CL football, and therefore bigger squads of top players. What is Man Utd's best XI? It's hard to say. Kagawa, Nani, Valencia, Wellbeck and Hernandez all played regularly throughout the season, as did Young when he was fit. City didn't rotate properly and they had a brick season. Benitez rotated Chelsea and had Europa League "specialists" such as Moses, Torres and Lampard. Arsenal didn't have the squad to compete on two fronts, they dropped points three times after CL group stage games (one at home to Fulham and one against Villa when they were playing terribly), if they'd stayed in Europe they probably would have struggled domestically.
It's not like this stuff is ground breaking. Lots of managers slag off the Europa League. I just hope that AVB now realises that we do not have the resources to finish top 4 AND win the EL right now. A disappointment in AVB's first season has been that he has not developed any youth players into first team regulars, and the EL should be the opportunity to do that, not to tire out the first teamers.