The race for 86 points

[Kandi1977]

Poking someone on the chin = 6 game ban. Deliberately Smashing someone full force in the head with the elbow = 3 games. FA logic

 

[r-u-s-x]

We could always spend less on wages and more on transfer fees.

in the last set of accounts we were closer to Hull on Wages than Liverpool - we are spending less than everyone on Transfer fees and less than our competitors on Wages.

 

[Jordinho]

in the last set of accounts we were closer to Hull on Wages than Liverpool - we are spending less than everyone on Transfer fees and less than our competitors on Wages.

 

[Raziel]

@Jordinho is that wages only? and whats the source?

 

[Spur of the moment]

@Jordinho is that wages only? and whats the source?

I thought it was total transfer spend. Or maybe income from transfers. I do wish when people put up graphs and tables they'd put some sort of explanation of what it's meant to be.

fudging annoying.

 

[billyiddo]

its yearly wage bill - nothing to do with transfers.

he's replied to a post stating we have a wage bill closer to Hull than we do Liverpool, what else would it be?

 

[Spur of the moment]

I thought it was total transfer spend. Or maybe income from transfers. I do wish when people put up graphs and tables they'd put some sort of explanation of what it's meant to be.

fudging annoying.

Or at least quote the source. It's just a jumble of meaningless bollox otherwise.

 

[Spur of the moment]

its yearly wage bill - nothing to do with transfers.

he's replied to a post stating we have a wage bill closer to Hull than we do Liverpool, what else would it be?

The message he was responding to refers to transfers as well as wages.

 

[billyiddo]

The message he was responding to refers to transfers as well as wages.

it does... but he bolded the wages talk

 

[SteveAWOL]

FWIW... Net transfer spending since the start of the millennium, from @SportingIntel

And wages up till 2012, from same source... Chavski must've topped £2bn by now, judging by Billy's more recent figures...

 

[Spur of the moment]

it does... but he bolded the wages talk

I did wonder about that but still found it confusing because usually there is a legend or something to clarify what it's meant to be.

 

[billyiddo]

I did wonder about that but still found it confusing because usually there is a legend or something to clarify what it's meant to be.

fair enough - im so used to looking at wages graphs and the like since posting on here i can spot them a mile off these days

 

[Jordinho]

@Jordinho is that wages only? and whats the source?

That is wages.

They have the same numbers here and here, taken from clubs' accounts.

 

[jaysea67]

Those figures don't agree to staff costs in Spurs' published accounts which were £100.4m for 2013-14 and £100.8m for 2014-15 (the latest available year).

 

[r-u-s-x]

I was going by Swiss ramble - have we released the accounts for 2016/2017 yet?
http://swissramble.blogspot.ch/sear...00+01:00&max-results=20&start=1&by-date=false

 

[r-u-s-x]

That is wages.

They have the same numbers here and here, taken from clubs' accounts.

"The above figures were taken from official clubs accounts ended 2013,2014 while the 2015 figures are speculative from sources like guardian.co.uk who publish premier league club finance details every years."

 

[r-u-s-x]

not to be hung up on this (Liverpool) but they have just published last years accounts. I would be surprised if our wages have not risen at a similar pace.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/liverpools-wage-bill-soars-25-9979630


Liverpool's wage bill has soared to more than £200million per annum after a rise of 25 per cent, report the Liverpool Echo.

The Reds shelled out £208,258,000 on salaries for players and staff for the 12 months up to May 31 2016 - more than Premier League rivals Emirates Marketing Project (£198m) and Arsenal (£195m).

That represents a hefty increase on the previous year when Liverpool’s wage bill was £166,085,000. The details are included in the club’s accounts which have now been filed at Companies House.

 

[FatBloke]

not to be hung up on this (Liverpool) but they have just published last years accounts. I would be surprised if our wages have not risen at a similar pace.

Well, we're no longer paying Winks and Dele in turnips...

 

[ricky2tricky4city]

not to be hung up on this (Liverpool) but they have just published last years accounts. I would be surprised if our wages have not risen at a similar pace.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/liverpools-wage-bill-soars-25-9979630


Liverpool's wage bill has soared to more than £200million per annum after a rise of 25 per cent, report the Liverpool Echo.

The Reds shelled out £208,258,000 on salaries for players and staff for the 12 months up to May 31 2016 - more than Premier League rivals Emirates Marketing Project (£198m) and Arsenal (£195m).

That represents a hefty increase on the previous year when Liverpool’s wage bill was £166,085,000. The details are included in the club’s accounts which have now been filed at Companies House.

Dont think ours would have risen much in 2015-16 (imo)

 

[metalgear]

It's just where all the increase in TV money went, expect to see the same for most clubs

Sent from my SM-T819Y using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app