Consistency is the key. Liverpool and City are the evidence of thar, and set the bar.
I started to write a post in agreement with that, but then I got thinking. Is it really? Or is it just a lazy cliché that all of us use?
I mean, the current Liverpool and Emirates Marketing Project teams have a very high bar. Let's say that their top-level performance is a 10. At that level, they're destroying most teams and, to be honest, capable of beating any team in world football. But sometimes they drop to 8. They'll still beat most teams but, against better opponents (or ones that have a particularly inspired day), they might drop points. Consistency for those two teams means hitting a 9 every week.
On that scale, I'm going to put Spurs at 8 on a decent week. We drop down to 7, sometimes 6 (Brighton, Burnley). Sometimes we hit a 9, and I feel that's our current ceiling. A few years ago it was clearly a 10 -- on form, we could (and did!) beat anyone.
So consistency
for the current Spurs team is hitting that 8 (or better) every game. That cuts out most of the annoying defeats and probably gets us top 4, just. To become title challengers, we have to raise our ceiling too. Become an 8-10 team rather than a 6-9 one.
Of course, it's more complicated than that -- there are two teams on every pitch, and sometimes one just won't let the other play. At Anfield last week, were Spurs and Liverpool both at 8? Or 9, with us getting marked up for executing a gameplan and the Scousers matching it? Were we that bad against Brighton, or did they play well?