Baleforce
Arthur Rowe
I wonder if there is a correlation between those who wanted Poch out and those who want ENIC out. Careful for what you wish for.
I don't think so, I very much did and I very much don't.
I wonder if there is a correlation between those who wanted Poch out and those who want ENIC out. Careful for what you wish for.
Defo Empty currently and have felt that way for a while !!Ultimately are you a glass-half-full or empty person?
My issue with not doing it organically is no one really cares how you do it anymore
All I heard yesterday was the miracle of city and the mastery of pep
No one cares one jot about them buying success, just the actual success. And city will spend more this summer to buy more success
It’s not what I’d like but it’s almost palatable now
Enic can’t do that. TBF very very few owners can.
So we either have to be smarter or possibly luckier, on and off the pitch
My issue with not doing it organically is no one really cares how you do it anymore
All I heard yesterday was the miracle of city and the mastery of pep
No one cares one jot about them buying success, just the actual success. And city will spend more this summer to buy more success
It’s not what I’d like but it’s almost palatable now
Enic can’t do that. TBF very very few owners can.
So we either have to be smarter or possibly luckier, on and off the pitch
Sky's coverage was embarassing yesterday, it was like Emirates Marketing Project day, amazing what you can do with £2bn of investment !!I found the messaging/commentary yesterday re City/Pep very annoying/depressing/stunning, especially in light of the additional statements about how "English football had been saved by the failure of ESL"
The fact that they threw £2B of money from questionable sources at a club that in 130 years had achieved 9 trophies, then same club wins 12 in less than a decade but the integrity of the game is safe?
Does anyone really think if Spurs has spent £480M on defenders alone we wouldn't have won a trophy, wtf?
Yep, voted 3, but 3.5 would be the answer. 4 is never going to happen, Levy would never (and quite rightly) say here's the budget, do what you will.Somewhere between 3 & 4 - we need a DoF/transfer/scouting revamp
There was a bit where Tyler said, "It's bad enough being part of the ESL, but even worse when you're English", and then the camera zoomed in, and lingered on Daniel Levy! Hatchet job or what!Sky's coverage was embarassing yesterday, it was like Emirates Marketing Project day, amazing what you can do with £2bn of investment !!
Yep, I remember this. It's just more cheap ESL Sky prattling don't dwell on it.There was a bit where Tyler said, "It's bad enough being part of the ESL, but even worse when you're English", and then the camera zoomed in, and lingered on Daniel Levy! Hatchet job or what!
He is a total clam, but really was a massive clam towards us yesterdayThere was a bit where Tyler said, "It's bad enough being part of the ESL, but even worse when you're English", and then the camera zoomed in, and lingered on Daniel Levy! Hatchet job or what!
Options 3 and 4 are entirely different....Options 3 and 4 are more or less the same. Levy is never going to give up control of the financial aspects of transfers (and I wouldnt want him too), but I feel that a DoF would be helpful to oversee player identifcation part of transfers and all other footballing matters
Indeed matey. I can vouch that you took this exact opinion (as you were in the same camp as me).Not hindsight from me. In the hours after Poch's sacking, I was convinced (and probably proclaiming on here), that the only way it could ever turn out well was if we replaced him with a very similar version of him. And for me at that point in time that meant Nagelsmann or Ten Hag, who I still think are the two outstanding candidates (though I like Potter and Parker too).
I don't mean to sound smug about it. It's just that it did seem just as obvious at that point in time as it does now. Mourinho was always an anti-football dinosaur who'd just destroyed his two previous teams.
The question gives four possible answers and a 5th catch all 'something else'. One of the options for an answer is to carry on exactly as we are now so nothing entitled there at all.I don't think any of us know enough about transfers to be qualified to say if Hitchen is doing well or not. For example, we don't know which players are chosen by the manager, Levy, or other scouts etc. For all we know Hitchen just negotiates the deals, and maybe Levy has seen Hitchen secure some great deals. Does anyone know any different?
Overall the premise of the question is a little entitled. Ultimately are you a glass-half-full or empty person?
I'm not sure there is to be honest.... From what I have been able to tell on here a lot of those who wanted Poch out are those that think ENIC can do no wrong.I wonder if there is a correlation between those who wanted Poch out and those who want ENIC out. Careful what you wish for.
Two proven top class DoFs in Rangnick and Campos are actually available on the open market.Without knowing everything about the financial situation, it's difficult to form an opinion.
I've read somewhere that we have the biggest debt in European football (though 800m come from the stadium). If the Covid situation lasts a couple more years, we're toast whatever we do.
At the moment, a director of football seems like the way forward but we should also keep in mind that all DoF aren't good at their jobs. Add to that the fact that the job has become a lot more difficult than it was 10-20 years ago and finding the right man for the job becomes increasingly difficult. At the same time, whoever we choose has to given a few years at least. There's no point in creating such a structure if we're going to chop and change every other year, because this or that new player turns out to be a flop.
So, we're looking for a man with enough of a reputation to lock horns with Levy when need be but who hasn't been signed by a bigger club, yet. Alright... Ah, and in an ideal world, Levy would still have some kind of veto on contracts - assuming the DOF is given a budget to work with.
I'm not sure the egos of all involved would allow for such a structure. The most likely outcome is that we will continue as we are and maybe appoint a straw man as a DoF to take the fall the next time things go wrong. With (a lot of) luck, we'll stumble onto the next Pochettino sooner or later. The bottom line is, we'll never be able to compete with the Cities of this world financially, so we'll always be second-best when it comes to attracting top candidates.
Not on Emirates Marketing Project's scale no.... But I think we are actually in the minority instead of majority when it comes to owners who don't inject any capital into the club.My issue with not doing it organically is no one really cares how you do it anymore
All I heard yesterday was the miracle of city and the mastery of pep
No one cares one jot about them buying success, just the actual success. And city will spend more this summer to buy more success
It’s not what I’d like but it’s almost palatable now
Enic can’t do that. TBF very very few owners can.
So we either have to be smarter or possibly luckier, on and off the pitch
The question gives four possible answers and a 5th catch all 'something else'. One of the options for an answer is to carry on exactly as we are now so nothing entitled there at all.