• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The Game Is About Glory Podcast

This is all about agendas though (not by you). The governance bodies pretend that 80% of decisions the refs make are subjective so they corrupt an entire football structure by implementing things like "clear and obvious" to protect their own. When you really run a game based purely on the laws of the game there are so few things that are subjective. It becomes black and white so quickly. There are some, but they really are the minority.

Football could be so great again if the laws represented the spirit of the game, and the referees upheld these laws.

We now have an entire generation not even realising that what the refs are doing, and what the commentary teams and pundits are talking about isn't representing the laws at all. Gary Neville is about the worst at it. Alan Smith just makes stuff all the time, totally ignoring the laws of the game he's commentating on.
I think they should last make the rules clear and non subjective
That allows for less human error
But I can’t see how a ref can judge intent or force
What’s worse is he saw it yesterday and didn’t even book him (var can’t tell him to book him)
That’s as bad as the Arsenal game last year and the Davies kick from rice and also the red card in the Fulham game
Clear and the ref had a great view
 
I thought it was an awful first-half from a ref who, IMO, is arrogant. He did not give an early yellow when we were breaking away (I believe Enzo was the culprit). Davies got one inside 4 mins against was it Fulham or Bournemouth? The Caicedo foul is a clear red. Clear. 'Force'? Jesus, does the player have to sustain a massive injury to legitimize it? Terrible. Taylor also managed to give Chelsea a free-kick for virtually every breath which came within a couple of feet of a Chelsea player. It was pathetic. We repeatedly suffer these poor decisions, and have not received a penalty yet this season. I think we only got a couple last season.
 
I thought it was an awful first-half from a ref who, IMO, is arrogant. He did not give an early yellow when we were breaking away (I believe Enzo was the culprit). Davies got one inside 4 mins against was it Fulham or Bournemouth? The Caicedo foul is a clear red. Clear. 'Force'? Jesus, does the player have to sustain a massive injury to legitimize it? Terrible. Taylor also managed to give Chelsea a free-kick for virtually every breath which came within a couple of feet of a Chelsea player. It was pathetic. We repeatedly suffer these poor decisions, and have not received a penalty yet this season. I think we only got a couple last season.

The "aggressive" "in your face" "no time on the ball" "spurs need to be stronger there" tactics Bournemouth, Fulham and the like get away suddenly become fouls when we do it.
 
I think they should last make the rules clear and non subjective
That allows for less human error
But I can’t see how a ref can judge intent or force
What’s worse is he saw it yesterday and didn’t even book him (var can’t tell him to book him)
That’s as bad as the Arsenal game last year and the Davies kick from rice and also the red card in the Fulham game
Clear and the ref had a great view

Yep, the hi-tech industry gave the football industry this amazing piece of technology to make the officials life easy. However, they totally forgot that the idiots in the football industry are just that....fecking idiots. Helping with yellow and red cards is one just area that VAR could be massively involved in. In fact, you could argue that they could prompt the referee on every single one.

What needs to happen at the high end of the game is for the guy (or gal) we currently call the 4th official to be in charge of the game. That game manager would have 3 on-pitch officials and a team of video analysts under their control. They would be able to use their own eyes and have access to the tech as well to support their team. The entire scope of what we call VAR would help clean the game up from both the on-pitch referee's not using the laws to the cheating players. Both are equal problems.

It wouldn't actually look any different to the fans. It would just be more efficiently run.
 
I think they should last make the rules clear and non subjective
That allows for less human error
But I can’t see how a ref can judge intent or force
What’s worse is he saw it yesterday and didn’t even book him (var can’t tell him to book him)
That’s as bad as the Arsenal game last year and the Davies kick from rice and also the red card in the Fulham game
Clear and the ref had a great view

The Jota head-kick on Skipp at Liverpool two years ago also stands out as a milestone fudge up. I don't understand why VAR could not have sent Taylor to the monitor though as it was a red.
 
In my cynical nature I thought you guys would maybe have been over the top in your condemnation of the tifo throwing to distract attention from the results/ performances etc but instead it was swept aside with a "well Chelsea fans used to do loads worse" - a rather surprising attitude especially Steff who usually wants to hone in on the human aspect of things.

I just find it crazy that grown ups who presumably have jobs and families suddenly think it's okay to throw whatever is given to them at people trying to do their jobs. Do ya think the Spurs players see that and think "What a great bunch of fans we have"?

And I'm not so sure we can blame society or people not liking Australia for people not being delighted with the current state of affairs but that's only my opinion.

Football is changing for everyone, pressure is there for every team, particularly the underperformed ones and fixture congestion is what big clubs have to deal with. None of these things are exclusive to us. Whether we label something a reason or an excuse it doesn't change the circumstances, perhaps it makes it feel better for those discussing it if they are trying to newspeak their way out of negativity.

You can't be tight defensively whilst losing as many games as we have, the lack of clean sheets and the factual record of set piece goals conceded over the last two seasons attest to that. We might look good in certain metrics but how it filters through to the points on the table is crucial, and the goal difference is fascinating, but not the crucial part of the equation..

Good points on Bergvall, yeah he's looked fine running around a bit in games where the story has already been written. In some ways it's hard getting up to the speed of a game as a sub but in others, you can stand out if you do the basics well if the 1st team have not been capable of doing so up until that point in the game. It's different from the start and Sunday will hopefully be Bergvall showing he can can do it when it matters.

On telling someone verbually abusing Ange / players to shut the fudge up, I'm not really sure that solves a situation. The abusive person doesn't normally go "Oh, do you know what, I definitely should shut the fudge up, thank you good sir for making me see the error of my ways". It's unpleasant and cringeworthy though, I agree on that 100%.

I feel a bit of a "If you don't have faith in the current project, you're part of the problem" from the pod, and it's an opinion which you're all entitled to of course. I just don't know how long that stance remains viable if we show no signs of improvement. You're not a bad fan for wanting your team to improve, the idea is to progress from one season to the next, to be moving in the right direction..

Interesting points on the anger at the stadium. It'll always be a what could've been - just when the lane was becoming a fortress we shifted to a stadium that our delicate players just couldn't cope with playing at, for long term financial gain whilst bricking it in the short to medium term.
 
Good call on Bergvall potentially being a 6. I thought his play at Djurgården reminded me a lot of Moussa Dembele. Could receive the ball anywhere and turn on a penny, low center of gravity so flipped people left and right at will. Just needs to get used to the pace. He had a very decent match yesterday.
 

https://thegameisaboutglory.co.uk/category/podcast/

Night Of The Living Djed​

Season 5, Ep. 24

Sunday, December 15, 2024

Steff, Milo, and Ram reflect on a resounding 5-0 thumping of Southampton, delight in this affirmation of Angeball, contemplate why we sell all our long-haired legends to Real Madrid, and shower praise on Archie Gray, Lucas Bergvall AND Djed Spence...we have a laugh with this week's episode so join us!

1734307112856-e7cb318a-516d-4a54-b68a-b0e6310a9655.jpeg
 
...of course, if he is rested/rotated Thursday, plays Sunday and is instrumental in smashing the scousers, it would have to be

DjedPool
 
Are You Not Entertained?
Season 5 Episode 25

Steff and Milo reflect on 16 goals over two games, the importance of staying the course when you have a plan, and why words matter. There are also more culinary metaphors and some festive drinks suggestions. You know us, it's never dull...


Copy of Copy of Djed.png
 
This has gradually become one of my favourite Tottenham podcasts. You guys talk a lot of sense which I agree with and you do not bore the crap out of me with negativity.
 
The press are out to get him now.
They need churn and this is going to be it.
Can't go for pep,
Can't go amorin,
Nothing to go for with Chelsea or Liverpool.
Of course the one they should be going for is Arteta.
He's the one who is supposed to be in prime position to take advantage of city's downfall, he's had the most time to build a side, a method and a mentality.
After all the smoke they've been blowing up his arse for the last three years he has not stepped up.
Six behind Liverpool with a new manager and little transfer activity, not great is it.
 
Back